Skip to comments.
Has Game of Thrones gone too far? Scene involving group of prostitutes at start of new series..
UK Daily Mail ^
| April 9, 2014
| Laura Cox
Posted on 04/09/2014 11:34:49 AM PDT by C19fan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
I never seen the show but I do know enough it is NC-17 material that has previous shown lots of nudity, sex, incest and graphic violence. In its fourth season some people are now "shocked" some man of means is shown picking a prostitute. What parents would allow their "young girls" to watch to watch this show in the first place?
1
posted on
04/09/2014 11:34:49 AM PDT
by
C19fan
To: C19fan
What are parents thinking allowing [young girls] to watch this in the first place?
2
posted on
04/09/2014 11:37:50 AM PDT
by
Ingtar
(The NSA - "We're the only part of government who actually listens to the people.")
To: C19fan
After seeing all the articles about the show, I watched it. It’s porn masked with a script.
3
posted on
04/09/2014 11:38:04 AM PDT
by
aimhigh
(John 14:21)
To: C19fan
its a soft porn show
the story sounded interesting but after a while I just could not stand the crudity - which does nothing to advance the story
4
posted on
04/09/2014 11:39:15 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
To: C19fan
It’s premium cable...you have to pay to get it. Anything after that is on YOU, not the show.
5
posted on
04/09/2014 11:39:49 AM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: C19fan
In Merry old England hookers had to display themselves naked to the clientele, marketing is all.
6
posted on
04/09/2014 11:41:13 AM PDT
by
Little Bill
(EVICT Queen Jean)
To: C19fan
The show is very similar to the books it is based on. The very graphic nature of the scenes in the show is unnecessary. Martin has written a terrific series of fantasy novels with compelling characters. The sex scenes need not be so explicit or graphic in the novels or the show. The show would lose nothing that makes it genuinely worthwhile by toning down those scenes.
To: GeronL
8
posted on
04/09/2014 11:42:38 AM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: C19fan
As a fan of the show and books, yes they have gone to far in making for no reason Prince Oberyn an aggressive homosexual.
The character was not as such in the book. In fact, there was really on the vaguest reference of a gay relationship between two characters in the first book. It was never openly described or even discussed.
However, despite the fact that there is apparently an little flying fairy on the set somewhere with a needs more gay in it wand injecting gay into everything it can find, the scene with Arya and Sandor at the end was almost flawless.
It was just absolutely brilliantly filmed, and I loved watching it. The actor and actress who plays each are just phenomenal.
But please, Homosexual Box Office, we don’t need or want the gay. Seriously, keep that damn crap to yourself, because it’s obnoxious and boring.
9
posted on
04/09/2014 11:42:53 AM PDT
by
chris37
(Heartless.)
To: NFHale
10
posted on
04/09/2014 11:44:28 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
To: NFHale
She’s mentally unbalanced.
11
posted on
04/09/2014 11:45:40 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: GeronL
I gave up on The Bridge for the same reason. Actually turned out to be a pretty disgusting show with only one likable character, the Chief of Police on the American side.
12
posted on
04/09/2014 11:45:40 AM PDT
by
cld51860
(Oderint dum metuant)
To: cld51860
If Thrones cut out all the porn - it seems like an interesting story underneath there somewhere
13
posted on
04/09/2014 11:47:26 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
To: GeronL
Living with these people is like being locked in a room with a psychotic. He’s got his meds, for now... but he’s gonna run out of them soon.
That’s what it feels like. They’re mentally unstable and deficient in even the most basic sense of human morality.
14
posted on
04/09/2014 11:47:30 AM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: C19fan
i’d’say young liberal women flukes told them to embrace their inner slut pride.
15
posted on
04/09/2014 11:47:40 AM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: trisham
16
posted on
04/09/2014 11:47:51 AM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: NFHale
Hi, NFHale. It seems that we agree. :)
17
posted on
04/09/2014 11:49:56 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: NFHale
18
posted on
04/09/2014 11:50:17 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
To: C19fan
First, it's a pay channel. Second, the porn scenes really don't add anything to the content -- and actually take considerably away from it -- so DVR the episode and FF through the objectionable parts. Third: Those things said, who is letting "young girls" watch this show? These days you have to screen all of the content for objectionable messages, including Disney, ABC "Family," and even Nickelodeon. What Hollywood considers "age appropriate" is even sicker than what's considered age appropriate in the public schools...
19
posted on
04/09/2014 11:50:44 AM PDT
by
FredZarguna
(Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!)
To: Wolfie
Exactly. It’s a choice. Don’t blame the show. We do too much of that and take away personal responsibility, always blaming someone else.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson