Would only be SF that wants squalor rather than an economy.
1 posted on
03/09/2014 11:44:10 AM PDT by
Olog-hai
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Olog-hai
Google seems to be becoming the Left’s next Standard Oil, Ma Bell, Coca Cola, Exxon, McDonalds, Halliburton. I hope they enjoy the attention.
2 posted on
03/09/2014 11:47:33 AM PDT by
Paine in the Neck
(Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
To: Olog-hai
> Would only be SF that wants squalor rather than an economy.
Unemployed people have more time for unnatural acts.
3 posted on
03/09/2014 11:48:03 AM PDT by
Slings and Arrows
(Richard Warman censors free speech.)
To: Olog-hai
You vote lib, you get lib. May they all reap what they sow.
5 posted on
03/09/2014 11:54:55 AM PDT by
Viennacon
To: Olog-hai
Telegraph won’t let me read the article without subscribing
6 posted on
03/09/2014 11:55:12 AM PDT by
yldstrk
( My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: Revolting cat!
7 posted on
03/09/2014 11:55:36 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(The Texas judge's decision was to pave the way for same sex divorce for two Massachusetts women.)
To: Olog-hai
Another version of the story was that she went to a bar called Molotov’s in San Francisco, which was where this happened. I wonder if they serve Molotov cocktails there..............
To: Olog-hai
The liberals loved Google when they were just starting out, and the employees went to work in shorts and sandals and roller-skated down the hallways, or hopped around on giant bouncy-balls as they tried to think up whimsical tricks to pull on their search site (i.e. Google is going to put a research center on the moon - apply now!)
Now that they are a big evil corporation like Microsoft who pull down billions of dollars a quarter in profits, they are not quite so adored by the San Francisco socialists anymore.
To: Olog-hai
There's a certain segment of Google employees - doesn't seem to be the developers or architects, more the peripheral types involved in non-technical roles, and always single - who prefer to live all the way up in San Francisco. I have no idea why, SF is even more expensive than Silicon Valley, the weather is much worse, parking is non-existent and increasingly the whole city smells like some vagrant relieved himself not too far away.
Anyway, if some hipster douche wants to live up in SF it's because she completely agrees with and supports the mindset up there - she's just surprised that it bit her in the butt when she expected to be the one braying at others about their evils.
To: Olog-hai
the otherwise tolerant, liberal and peace-loving population San Francisco is none of those things.
Some of the most violent, ideologically rigid and IN-tolerant people you will ever confront.
To: Olog-hai
The odd and colorful homeless if all types capering and begging on the streets is probably a better tourist attraction than sensible industry-and SanFran has been a place to visit and watch the freak show for a long time...
14 posted on
03/09/2014 12:02:35 PM PDT by
Texan5
(" You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
To: Olog-hai
Anyone driving a car with that garbage on their face should go to jail!
16 posted on
03/09/2014 12:05:22 PM PDT by
dalereed
To: Olog-hai
Could be a bit of hyperbole going on here. I don’t see Google Glass laying waste to more than 50 or 60 blocks of downtown San Francisco. 100, tops.
To: Olog-hai
Last 'graph of the article:
Miss Slocum believes differences will be resolved. Im really excited about the time were living in, she said. Every day there is some new invention thats going to dramatically change our lives.
Sara honey, you may not know it, but there are millions of people, right here in the US, who don't want their lives "dramatically changed" by some intrusive, crappy piece of technology.
Here's a challenge for you: read 1984 and look at the path you're going down.
If that proves a bit daunting for you, maybe you can struggle through the Cliff Notes.
19 posted on
03/09/2014 12:06:33 PM PDT by
upchuck
(South Carolina Representative Trey Gowdy for Speaker of the House!!!)
To: Olog-hai
SF won’t settle for anything less than becoming a 3rd world slum....How’s that for equality?
20 posted on
03/09/2014 12:12:40 PM PDT by
Dallas59
(Obama: The first "White Black" President.)
To: Olog-hai
The article says, San Francisco, where a section of the otherwise tolerant, liberal and peace loving population
Then the article goes on to demonstrate that they are not liberal (in the real sense of the word) or peace loving. They are, instead, liberal in the modern political sense of not tolerating anybody different or more diverse than themselves. How can people maintain the cognitive dissonance of what they call San Franciscans who act this way and the way those same people actually act? Id simply describe them as entitled, angry people upset that there are those living around them making much more money and having way cooler gadgets. These same San Franciscans would be throwing their wooden shoes into the new mechanical looms that were taking their home weaving jobs. (The shoes were called sabot, hence the word sabotage.) What do you call throwing a brick through buss windows?
To: Olog-hai
23 posted on
03/09/2014 12:22:41 PM PDT by
Carriage Hill
(Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading.)
To: Olog-hai
Angry liberals, who’d a thunk it!
25 posted on
03/09/2014 12:25:54 PM PDT by
vpintheak
(I will not comply!)
To: Olog-hai
Would only be SF that wants squalor rather than an economy.
Why would that be so terribly hard to understand?
Wasn't the city more interesting and lively in the past?
Even in places where I've lived gentrification isn't any unalloyed blessing by any means.
29 posted on
03/09/2014 12:42:18 PM PDT by
x
To: Olog-hai
-— And, most of all, there is anger over spiraling rents and evictions as young tech workers colonize previously low-income areas. -—
Obviously real estate prices should be permanently fixed. Because... Uh... Just because.
38 posted on
03/09/2014 1:07:24 PM PDT by
St_Thomas_Aquinas
( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
To: Olog-hai
there is anger over spiraling rents and, yet, they keep voting for polices/taxes/regulations that help accelerate the rise in their rents...go figure
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson