The article says, “San Francisco, where a section of the “otherwise” tolerant, liberal and peace loving population…”
Then the article goes on to demonstrate that they are not liberal (in the real sense of the word) or peace loving. They are, instead, liberal in the modern political sense of not tolerating anybody different or more “diverse” than themselves. How can people maintain the cognitive dissonance of what they call San Franciscan’s who act this way and the way those same people actually act? I’d simply describe them as entitled, angry people upset that there are those living around them making much more money and having way cooler gadgets. These same San Franciscans would be throwing their wooden shoes into the new mechanical looms that were taking their home weaving jobs. (The shoes were called sabot, hence the word sabotage.) What do you call throwing a brick through buss windows?
This is classic liberal class-envy in action. They just hate the fact that these people work for a successful growing company that is causing their city to get more affluent. Real estate prices are rising (which cause increase in rents) and their town is getting saturated with upscale eateries and shops that the aging hippies can't afford because either their welfare checks aren't enough or their daddy's trust funds are running dry.
The liberals just HATE these Google buses!
