I think all US cars should have dashcams
The cops were completely justified and any freeper here who thinks otherwwise should go back to DUmmie land...
(I am being sracastic and getting in the first bootlicker freeper comment before the actual bootlickers make an appearence)
Save for later
Article is behind a subscription wall.
Could you please post a link to the Youtube video?
Thanks.
“Small-Town” “Police(cops)” are “good” for 3 “Things”:
1. Revenue “Generation(Speed/Stop Sign TRAPS)”
2. Trying to “score” Local High School “Chicks”
3. Trying to find “new” places to SLEEP thier “shift” “Away”
Oh and I forget GETTING FREE FOOD ANY way they can.
“Small-Town(and some not so small town)” “police” are by in large WORTHLESS as TITS on a Boar Hog!
Texas is very misunderstood here!
They do have the very worst thugs in the country in their small fiefdoms.
.
““Ever hear of the movie Deliverance?” he asked the out-of-towner.”
Out-of-towner should have then said to the cop, “Oh! You were the one playing the banjo, weren’t you?”
It’s been well known since the 60’s that it’s best to not draw any attention to ourself when traveling in Texas.
M4L
Honestly the man was lucky that he was not killed by the cops on the side of the road. Very lucky.
Electra is on the ‘short-cut’ from Dallas to Denver. Sounds like it is the Ludowici of Texas.
Well after reviewing the footage I think I know where the victim went astray. When he made the jackboot comment. That’s called escalation and he should have stopped there. He was right in telling the officer to stop searching the vehicle. Clearly the officer was conducting a search but using the liberal tactic of renaming it to “not a search” He opened the door and stuck his head inside and even leaned over clearly violating the 4th amendment. He should be fired or at minimum suspended without pay. It was very obvious this “team” uses this tactic to go on fishing expeditions and most likely use it often.
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (US Code - Section 1983): Civil action for deprivation of rights:
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
The guy should have first played the entire video and then started the commentary, I don’t want to sit through 19 minutes to eventually get to see what happened.