Replies

It’s a common pattern. PDSer spouts PDS and gets railed.
PDSer screams persecution/the forum has gone downhill
PDSer upset that people hold his feet to fire and avoids addressing his own BS in the matter.

Then they threaten to leave and rarely do. Attention whoring basically.

PDS and liberal behavior go hand in hand. There is nothing wrong with having disagreements with her over legit issues. But you RARELY see legit issues form the basis of a PDSer complaint.

Let's look at the quote by aft_lizard that Norm Lenhart says is an example of PDS. It's a reply by aft_lizard to this thread:

Priebus Tweet Sparks Outrage: Sarah Palin Not Mentioned as Important Figure in Women’s History Month

This is his reply:

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Why should he mention her? I am a big fan but historically she hasn’t done anything to warrant recognition outside of Alaska. Should he have said “Sarah Palin who resigned as Governor of Alaska and failed to win the Vice Presidency as the second woman to ever run?”

13 posted on Saturday, March 01, 2014 7:30:28 PM by aft_lizard

Is that PDS (Palin Derangement Syndrome)?

“Is that PDS (Palin Derangement Syndrome)? “

Well lets see...

“Why should he mention her?”

Because she was a Gov with a sky high approval rating that gutted much of the corruption in the Alaska GOP,fought like a dog to open the state to increased drilling, is one of a handful of people in the GOP that EVER took on Barry directly...for starters. All of which qualifies her for mention.

“I am a big fan’

All my friends are black!

“...but”

Always a “but”

“.. historically she hasn’t done anything to warrant recognition outside of Alaska.”

Odd then that those few things alone prove the poster either uninformed or intentionally twisting the truth.

“Should he have said “Sarah Palin who resigned as Governor of Alaska and failed to win the Vice Presidency as the second woman to ever run?”

Which, of course, as has been pointed out oh...a few hyndred thousand times incontinently ignores WHY she ‘resigned’ to say nothing of the fiasco that cost her the VP.

Does he mention the multiple ethics suits that all failed? Does he mention that the libs went after her staff? does he mention that in Alasks, she/they had to personally pay for their defense?

Nope. Did all that play a part? Yup.

In his glossing over of the situation he made the classic PDS move of leaving out the details intentionally to give an impression that “she quit” just cuz. There are only thousands of threads with PDSers doing exactly that and tens of thousands of replies when it happens.

As you are well aware. Because you were involved with many of those threads until being told to stay off the Palin threads along with all the other PDSers.

Remember that? I remember JR getting rather miffed about it. So spare is the ‘Voice of reason routine.’

We wont even get into how pathetic it is that he posted this ‘opus’ to begin with.