Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/01/2014 12:01:19 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind; SunkenCiv

It doesn’t surprise me if the book is better; that’s what happens when Hollywood tinkers with great literature of any kind. “1984” was the last movie I saw that was as good as the book it was based on.


2 posted on 03/01/2014 12:06:23 PM PST by Berosus (I wish I had as much faith in God as liberals have in government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
If you haven't seen Jesus of Nazareth you haven't seen the ultimate such film. The Greatest Story Ever Told was good, for its day, also.
3 posted on 03/01/2014 12:12:01 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2M for Sarah Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

It has “made for TV” written all over it. Why bother seeing it?


5 posted on 03/01/2014 12:13:41 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (If Barack Hussein Obama entertains a thought that he does not verbalize, is it still a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Haven’t seen the movie but the trailers have given me some sense of the “cringe” he talks about. But it sounds like the crucifixion part was good. I’ve always felt like depicting the brutality of the crucifixion was gratuitous, but I’m learning that for each undeserved brutal thing he received, I received undeserved forgiveness, favor, honor, healing, and riches. My focus is now on the degree of God’s love for me in taking all that I deserved and putting it on Jesus so that I now get all that Jesus deserves. Thank you Jesus.


6 posted on 03/01/2014 12:39:44 PM PST by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

There is absolutely no way to depict accurately the Bible on the screen. However, the goal was to spread the Gospel, which was Downey’s intention, so I applaud her. Did she succeed at that, I wonder? Why make changes to what Jesus actually said, according to Scripture, and create an impression that is inaccurate or misleading?

I agree that Downey was horribly miscast as Mary. Her awful plastic surgery was so distracting, let alone her looking like an Irish lady that wandered onto the set. In the tv production, she chose to highlight Samson and Delilah, but no mention of Jacob and his 12 sons - odd choice, I thought.

Mel Gibson was right when he said about his version of ‘The Passion of Christ’ - “This is my movie - if you don’t like it, go make your own movie.”


7 posted on 03/01/2014 12:40:43 PM PST by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Retarded drivel.

I very much admire Roam and her husband.

No doubt this will be an excellent film.

For the record I don’t think I know anyone associated with this movie.


8 posted on 03/01/2014 1:17:07 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

There is absolutely no excuse for not portraying Biblical characters exactly as in the Bible. The Downey/Burnett TV series on the Bible had so much fiction included that we turned it off by the second week.

Last night, we viewed the movie Jacob which my wife rented from Netflix. Not a bad movie but once again, they threw in silly scenes that were not in the Bible.

There is no excuse for doing that. One can produce a two hour length movie about significant Biblical characters without resorting to fictionalizing the character(s).


10 posted on 03/01/2014 1:24:10 PM PST by CdMGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson