Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: A Formerly Proud Canadian
The pressures required to power a vehicle are astronomical compared to the pressures of propane in a tank. You're not using the air as a fuel. You're using the elasticity of the pressurized gas to store energy.

I take it you've never seen a wall taken out by a cylinder of compressed gas when the regulator gets knocked off?

85 posted on 02/26/2014 3:02:05 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (If Barack Hussein Obama entertains a thought that he does not verbalize, is it still a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum
Currently, many buses operate on CNG at pressures of 200+ bar. Is a tank of natural gas compressed to 3,000 PSI any less dangerous than a tank of air compressed to 4,000 PSI? If either tank fails and you are in its path, you quickly meet your maker! If you are not so close, you burn to death with the one but not the other. CNG is arguably MORE dangerous because of the explosive potential stored as chemical energy, in addition to the potential energy stored as pressure. Perhaps you wish to remove CNG as a fuel source also because of the risk of explosion?

Compressed air propulsion is not new science! In 1879, the first mechanically powered submarine, the French Navy's Plongeur was powered by compressed air! Torpedoes were first powered by compressed air. Can a purely compressed air car work? Not very well and not very long, but such a system mated with an I/C engine sounds much better (and cheaper) than an electric hybrid.

A Lund University (Sweden) professor estimates that a compressed air hybrid system could save 60% of fuel consumption of city buses. There is logic in his comment. With stop and go driving, a bus uses energy when both accelerating and decelerating. If some of that energy used to decelerate could be captured to use in accelerating, the net result would be improved fuel efficiency, lower fuel costs and less pollution (and no, I do not believe that CO2 is pollution).

As I consider myself an average consumer, if Peugeot can produce a car that is of good quality and can reduce my costs, I would be interested in it. I will not write it off merely because I don't think they can do it. What I do know is, many cities suffer from pollution, especially vehicle exhaust emissions.

Below, is a picture of Calgary when there is a temperature inversion. Since there is no heavy industry, this ugly brown cloud is mostly caused by vehicle emissions. (Again, CO2 is not a pollutant, but there is lots of 'crap' in exhaust emissions.) I can only imagine what LA is like!

96 posted on 02/26/2014 4:45:51 PM PST by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was blind, but now I see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson