Posted on 02/25/2014 4:53:33 PM PST by Renfield
And now, for your Louisville moment of the day: Sharieff Rhaheed-Muhammed, a 2014 linebacker who signed with Louisville, was arrested yesterday for impregnating his 14-year-old cousin.
Fort Pierce, Florida police discovered the two had sex after the teenage girl gave her mom a positive pregnancy test and admitted what happened. She told police that Rhaheed-Muhammed didn’t force himself on her and that the sex “just happened,” and that he later tried again, but she refused. She had an abortion in November, and tests confirm that Rhaheed-Muhammaed is the father.
Rhaheed-Muhammaed was arrested on a felony charge of lewd lascivious behavior yesterday, and was released today. According to a UofL spokesman, Bobby Petrino “is aware of the situation.”
3…2…1…
It figures such a comment would come from a “Hoosier”. No, it is the University of Louisville, not Kentucky. U of L is famous, rather, infamous for taking in the ethically challenged and that includes their coaches.
17 is old enough to do life as he should
I was born and reared in the South by Parents whose ancestors had been in that part of Florida since at least the 1700s. I love the South and it is home to the best people in the world.
I will have to admit there is a little something to the really young age of marriages. Back in the 70s I was working out of Dothan, Alabama. I was searching marriage records as part of my job. I was really surprised how many 14 year olds had gotten married.
Of course that is married not just hooking up.
When statutory rape is involved I guess
That too!
What is the legal standard for rape in Florida?
We all see the abortion, but we are trying to discuss the sex story and felony charges before we shut the thread down by all posting over and over, our condemnation of the abortion.
If that were true, some abortuaries would be testing upwards of 75% of their ... jobs. And I can’t believe that’s happening.
Planned Parenthood always IGNORES laws on that stuff. They are above the law, so far.
Ages 17 and 14, not the sex crime of the century.
____________
Not a sex crime at all IMHO
Exactly. That’s why I find it curious that paternity seems to have been so definitively established in this case.
Maybe her parents actually cared enough to pursue this.
Stone her!
OK - I understand that. But on the topic of “Huh-— Is this such a crime? really?” -— I thought it relevant to mention the dead baby.
He’s 17 now. But he wasn’t when it happened.
I mention abortion every post, in my tag line.
so?
It’s still wrong.
He probably mistook her for the 16 year old.
Beat me to it.
Now we wait for the story about the football player sexually assaulting his underage male cousin.
ROFLMAO!! Good one. ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.