Posted on 02/24/2014 3:07:10 PM PST by Cruz_West_Paul2016
And just to add to this laughable proposal to penalize players for using the "N-Word",why not just hire about 20 "N-Word Deaf Interpreters",line them up across the football field to monitor the players racial slurs?Then they can relay the slurs to the ref's and the crowd using sign language.But what about when the "White Players" call each other names like "Whitey","Yo,White Boy" and "Cracker-Head"?,Is this "N-Word Penalty" proposal only for black slurs?,Will White Players receive a 30 yard penalty VS a Black player receiving a 15 yard penalty?
Female Irish, Church of England Episcopal. (3rd generation and family is now in the 6th!)
What a crazy thing...thanks for the laugh!
i have no idea, are locker rooms segrerated?Locker rooms for Regular White Players?Highly Paid Black Players?Confused Gender? and Newly announced Black Gay Players?
hey,didn’t some highly respectable,well mannered champion boxer once refer to another boxer as a very private female body part? what did he call him out loud? anyone remember?
Wanna mess with the black guy across the line from you? Just as the ball is snapped call him “cracker lover!” He’ll either get mad, bust out laughing or his mind will blank. Whichever it is he’ll blow the play.
I can not really explain why or when I lost my taste for professional sports. I had season seats for baseball, football and hockey long after I had stopped watching basketball. It all just became business and players were moving around and not staying with the teams who invested in them and fans who tried to support them...example: Shack and Penny leaving Orlando.
I still love hockey, but not on TV. Their cameras only follow the puck and you miss the plays and positioning that make it exciting! I saw a little of the Olympic hockey and it looked like they used a better camera system...
Injuries are still increasing.
Physics is difficult to overcome.
Bigger faster stronger all the time.
The ESPNification of sports has contributed. The fascination with certain athletes and teams make so-called professionals in the media come across as cheerleaders. I remember an ESPN radio person apologize for showing two small market Midwest teams (Milwaukee and Minnesota I think) on a Sunday night game (relatively early in the season, too, IIRC) and he admitted that his cohorts only care about certain teams. My guess is that his cohorts wouldn’t sound knowledgeable or would actually have to learn about the non-glitter teams and players when anyone can spew opinions about the publicized products.
Too many TV ads, delays over instant replays extends the games and another pet peeve is the constant statistical data shown during the broadcasts. Baseball games especially are too long. I also don’t need “fantasy football” stats shown constantly on the scroll in a manner which distracts from the primary purpose: enjoying that televised game. Show out of town scores but running back X has 4 carries for 22 yards in another game doesn’t appeal to me. I prefer the “less is more” motto. There are other reasons: high ticket prices, seasons are too long, competition for entertainment among others. Plus, I’d rather go to a horse track. :-)
Yes, a contributing and continuing problem to hockey’s image is that the game doesn’t translate as well on TV as it does in person. Certainly, the unfamiliarity of players since most don’t come from the U.S. college hockey scene as is the case in the NFL and NBA.
Ramble ended.
It even gets worse when you hear the rational of who can use the “N” word and who can’t... Utterly stupid in every sense of the word.
I like to describe myself as “honkadelic.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.