Posted on 02/23/2014 11:06:23 AM PST by nickcarraway
In almost any science-fiction scenario involving time-travel, the default action is to kill Hitler. As terrible a human being as he was, there are many reasons why this probably isnt a good idea
If you find yourself suddenly gaining access to a time machine, whats the first thing youd do? If you said kill Adolf Hitler, then congratulations; youre a science-fiction character. Actually, the whole access to a time machine thing suggested that already, but the desire to kill Hitler clinches it. Any time-travelling sci-fi character (at least ones created by Western society) seems to want to kill Hitler, so much so that theres a trope about how its impossible.
That attempting to kill Hitler has become such a common sci-fi plot device speaks volumes. What about Stalin? He was arguably worse, killing 20 million of his own people to fuel his ideology. But no, Stalin went about his business unmolested by time travellers, all of whom are busy targeting Hitler.
Its understandable. Who wouldnt want to prevent the holocaust? Its probably the worst thing in history. And I only say probably because I dont know all of history, and the human capacity to be awful should not be underestimated. But as noble as it seems, killing the Fuhrer via time travel is a terrible idea, for real-world reasons, not just those in fiction. So should you get hold of a time machine and make plans to kill Hitler, here are some reasons why you shouldnt.
(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...
Not to change this into the religion forum but “even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world.” makes sense when people understand God’s perspective outside of time.
This actually makes sense:
No Hitler, no holocaust. No holocaust, no Israel.
As for killing Stalin? Not sure it would have changed much.
Himmler had the Waffen SS and the entire SS at his disposal to oppose the Wehrmacht. And I believe Hitler loyalists in the ranks would have revolt.
The Nazi Party was full of personal rivalries and animosities, Hitler was the glue that kept it all together, no one else would have been capable of uniting all of the various factions.
Vietnam, Rwanda and Iraq under Hussein come to mind..........
Could you please explain that statement? I have no idea what you are talking about.........
My kids and I had a discussion over Sunday Morning breakfast about a hypothetical movie plot where the protagonists have access to a time machine then have heated debates over which 19th and 20th century Marxist philosophers and collectivists should be killed.
Ok. I wont kill hitler.
How about if I just play the lottery instead?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.