Posted on 02/21/2014 7:02:47 PM PST by P.O.E.
Massive counterclaims, in excess of $10 million, have just been filed against climate scientist Michael Mann after lawyers affirmed that the former golden boy of global warming alarmism had sensationally failed in his exasperating three-year bid to sue skeptic Canadian climatologist, Tim Ball. Door now wide open for criminal investigation into Climategate conspiracy.Mann arrest photo
Buoyed by Dr Ball's successes, journalist and free-speech defender, Mark Steyn has promptly decided to likewise countersue Michael Mann for $10 million in response to a similar SLAPP suit filed by the litigious professor from Penn. State University against not just Steyn, but also the National Review, the Competitive Enterprise Institute and Rand Simberg. Ball's countersuit against Mann seeks "exemplary and punitive damages. " Bishop Hill blog is running extracts of Steyn's counterclaim, plus link.
Manns chief undoing in all such lawsuits is highlighted in a quote in Steyns latest counterclaim:
Plaintiff continues to evade the one action that might definitively establish its [his sciences] respectability - by objecting, in the courts of Virginia, British Columbia and elsewhere, to the release of his research in this field. See Cuccinelli vs Rectors and Visitors of the University of Virginia...
At last, after 3 years of legal wrangling, it is made clear why I was so bold as to formally undertake an indemnity to fully compensate Dr Ball for my own actions in the event Mann won the case. Respected Aussie climate commentator, Jo Nova was one of the few to commend my unparalled commitment to Ball's cause.
Steyns legal team, aware of the latest developments from Vancouver, have correctly adduced that Ball has effectively defeated Mann after the Penn. State pretenders preposterous and inactive lawsuit against Ball was rendered dormant for failure to prosecute. Under law, Manns prevarications, all his countless fudging and evasiveness in the matter, establishes compelling evidence that his motive was not to prove Ball had defamed him, but more likely a cynical attempt to silence fair and honest public criticism on a pressing and contentious government policy issue.
The fact Mann refused to disclose his hockey stick graph metadata in the British Columbia Supreme Court, as he is required to do under Canadian civil rules of procedure, constituted a fatal omission to comply, rendering his lawsuit unwinnable. As such, Dr Ball, by default, has substantiated his now famous assertion that Mann belongs "in the state pen, not Penn. State." In short, Mann failed to show he did not fake his tree ring proxy data for the past 1,000 years, so Balls assessment stands as fair comment. Moreover, many hundreds of papers in the field of paleoclimate temperature reconstructions that cite Manns work are likewise tainted, heaping more misery on the discredited UNs Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) which has a knack of relying on such sub prime science.
Where Do We Go From Here?
(Continued at site)
Go Mark!
“I love it when a plan comes together” George Peppard playing role in “the A team”
Freegards
LEX
Excellent metaphor, Enterprise. I was going to say, "Steyn is now in an excellent position to go after Mann with a gutting knife."
Finally, a good use for lawyers. Lots of lawyers, lots of chum.
Thanks Ernest!
Life is good!
Thanks for the ping.
Cry HAVOC, and let loose the personal injury lawyers against the GW hoaxers!
Manns chief undoing in all such lawsuits is highlighted in a quote in Steyns latest counterclaim:It's all about the science, doncha know.Plaintiff continues to evade the one action that might definitively establish its [his sciences] respectability - by objecting, in the courts of Virginia, British Columbia and elsewhere, to the release of his research in this field...
I wonder if Mann will call noted the client scientist and expert, who recently said that climate change is “undeniable fact”, and resides in the White House. Surely the Canadian courts will bow down before his superiorness and acquit Mann.
Bankrolled by David Suzuki. I didn’t even know he was still out there.
Interesting.
GE Will No Longer Design Projects to Please Climate Change Advocates
Charles Krauthammer Destroys Global Warming Myths in 89 Seconds
Obama & Kerry - Enviroclowns with No Knowledge of Climate Science
CNN Asks: Did Global Warming Have to do With the Recent Near-Earth Asteroid Fly-By?
Podcast: Is Climate Change Alarmism Actually Harming the Environment?
Udall feeling heat over ties to climate change billionaire
Report: Farmers Almanac more accurate than government climate scientists
Global Warming on Free Republic
This story is incorrect. Actually, Mann's lawsuit is being funded by his deep-pocket green friends. So I'm sure he'll try to bankrupt Ball, and Mark Steyn, if he can.
Excellent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.