For the yellowish protrustion to be Fuddy’s shoe, where we see the entire oval created by the sole of her shoe, what angle would that shoe have to be to the camera? Would it work to have the shoe perpendicular to the camera, or would the shoe have to be parallel to the camera?
Take a shoe with a white sole and hold it in front of you so that the person wearing the shoe would be in the position you believe Fuddy to be in those images and the shoe is right in front of you. How much of the sole do you see? What shape is it?
Now put the sole so you can see the entire oval shape made by it? When you are able to see that shape, where would the person wearing the shoe have to be?
The full images can be seen at my blog so you can see context or see the images smaller. These are the same resolution of photos as the photos in which you saw the other details you saw.
Why on earth would anyone waste their time indulging this nonsense when you have yet to show a single piece of evidence for your latest theory, whatever the he$$ it is.
Who gives a fig about the yellow shoe bottom - or are you going to continue until every shadow in every photograph is explained to your total satisfaction? GIVE IT UP - YOU LOST.
If you need answers to everything - why not talk to the guy who took the pictures? He is discussing you on fb and isn’t very impressed by your analysis. In fact he thinks you are crazy, and at the moment you aren’t doing much to defend that accusation. Please stop before it gets really ugly. How many peopke on this thread agree with you - is it 3 or 4? Even very hard core birthers are telling you you are wrong - please listen to them.
“Now put the sole so you can see the entire oval shape made by it? When you are able to see that shape, where would the person wearing the shoe have to be?”
Humans have these little things called “ankles”. They allow a foot to swivel around to many angles, quite independent of which direction the rest of your body is facing.
Butter, I do know a lot about the human body and ankles are very versatile. If she was thrashing or even riding the waves causing her legs to bend or cycle or whatever, the ankle has a lot of mobility. It is fruitless to ask the questions you are asking. I could lay down on the floor and have my body in many angles to my foot or even my foot’s rotation. With no pain involved.
Why don’t you state your hypothesis in order to make your questions relevant or even interesting. I love a good conspiracy and they exist, and there is something hinky about Fuddy and the way she died, but so far, there doesn’t seem to be a SHRED of evidence that these photos show anything amiss. That doesn’t mean there isn’t anything amiss. But obsessing over angles of bodies in the sea, any speck of blurry something on the surface, is pointless.
You showed great logic and conviction with all the discrepancies in Hawaii documentation and the BC. You are not showing the same logic here, and it scares me a little. Maybe just get outside and clear your mind and focus on other things for a bit. We need you at full strength.
It does look like a diver in some of the frames. We can’t really tell for sure. The original video needs to be enhanced to see this more clearly.