With this:
Says volumes about what he has between his big ears.
Posted on 02/02/2014 5:26:00 AM PST by Olog-hai
Climate change deniers are headless chickens, Prince Charles has claimed.
In an inflammatory speech, the heir to the throne spoke out against “the barrage of sheer intimidation” from what he described as powerful interest groups.
Addressing young environmental entrepreneurs at Buckingham Palace, he said skeptics were turning accepted scientific wisdom on its head. […]
Charles has long led the public charge against global warming—despite repeated warnings about his “meddling” in contentious global issues. His “headless chickens” jibe ranks among his strongest comments yet.
Benny Peiser, of the climate-skeptic Global Warming Policy Foundation, described the attack as aggressive and contentious. …
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
this dude is a total ass wipe
Given that dork’s decisions over his lifetime, I’d say he is the type that would believe in the liberal’s money maker of globull warming.
Someone should whack that inbred moron’s head with a 2x4..
Well it’s nice to know that Great Britain has its very own Al Gore. Maybe the two of them could go play on the beach somewhere with Barry and Chris and watch the water rise.
Fits Prince Charles to a "T".
Ah, they all sound alike. Could you understand how one is so easily confused by them and pardon me.
This winter the "sheer intimidation" of warmists has come from nature itself. Which is, I guess, a fairly powerful interest group.
Why doesn’t Chuckie donate his fortune to combat global warming if he feels so strongly about it?
What I would like to know is where will the elite liberals congregate when the planet they are destroying from within turns to crap?
We need to take that from them and force them back into society where they will have to face the people they set out to destroy.
Does Chuck ever consider the amount of evil CO2 let alone methane, a more potent green house gas, that everyday are emitted in his polo pony’s farts?
30 million or so is his actual annual income.
Centuries of inbreeding.
End of story.
This is why inbreeding doesn’t work.
The problem with hereditary monarchy, whether in England or North Korea, is regression to the mean. It takes a real gutsy leader to ascend the greasy pole of monarchy and start a dynasty, but the pampered hereditary princes, whose mothers are generally chosen of the basis of pulchritude rather than any other merits, are seldom up to the task of sustaining the enterprise. With the gradual ascendancy of the Parliament, and now the Commons, over the Government, the Monarch became a figurehead, and has been tolerated as the symbol of England, a totem invoked as an national symbol, little more. One problem for the house of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (rebranded “Windsor” during the Great War, cousin Nicklaus fared even worse) is that the current generation are not-at-all particularly photogenic, giving rise to calls for the Prince of Wales to abdicate in favor of his more attractive son, whose mother was as photogenic as she was ditzy.
Of course, given the way Americans choose their leaders, and judging by current results, maybe they have the right idea.
Well, we at least have the accusation that our heads have been lopped off, separating our intellectual machinery from our bodies as an “excuse” for our criticism of AGW.
Prince Charles and his ilk have no such “excuse” for believing in AGW except that they never had any brains to begin with. As Rush says...Empty Skulls of Mush.
as POTUS I would “deny” him a Visa to come here
he’s as much an “authority” on the subject as Al Bore but thinks his family position gives him a right to his ignorant crusade
With this:
Says volumes about what he has between his big ears.
30 million or so is his actual annual income
= = = = = = = = = = = ==
I was ‘reacting’ to a news blurb I heard the other day about how the ‘Royal Family’ was down to its last million or so.
Like the ‘man’ said, “How come we never hear about Welfare being ‘in trouble’ but ‘they’ are always saying Mil Ret, Social Security etc is in trouble...funny how the thing that the recipient HASN’T paid into is ‘stable’ and that which we contributed to is ‘in trouble’.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.