We're getting a bigger and bigger eyeful of the meaning of the word "perversion," aren't we?
Babies are human and have rights, too. The most basic ones is to be born to a mother and father who have a legally recognized commitment to provide them with a stable personal identity, a place in their kinship system of origin, and support and sustenance. This idea of exploiting Asian women by rental of their bodies as reproductive concubines is barbaric. It reduces the gestational mother to an instrumental, sub-personal level, and completely abrogates the gestational bonding needs of the child. The concoction and purchase of children as lifestyle accessories is a violation of human rights at the most foundational level.
In the 1800’s, wealthy women would buy their season of dresses from Worth in Paris. Trunks and trunks of dresses and accoutrements would be held up at customs while taxes were assesed.
These babies are just like those trunks of designer dresses to the LGBT’s. Status symbols.
Well said.
That's right, whether the couple desiring the child is heterosexual or homosexual. With heterosexuals, there are professional couples who turn to surrogacy so that the mother doesn't have to lose time off work, and then there are some women who don't want to carry a child, because they don't want to lose their figures; selfish all.
Yes, homosexuals are exploiting third world women so they can purchase future boy toys. No wonder Russia outlawed adoption by countries that allow homosexuals to adopt.