It's well past time for a full blown boycott of the Hollywood Box Office.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
I think Hollywood is a disaster area..
I predict this movie will get good reviews but flop at the box office.
2 posted on
01/16/2014 4:26:10 AM PST by
cableguymn
(It's time for a second political party.)
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
This will crash and burn no matter how much money and “star power” they throw at it.
3 posted on
01/16/2014 4:26:42 AM PST by
Little Ray
(How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
Yep! Here is the gun control zealots credo cited in the article: The movie mogul said his vision was to scare people away from firearms.
Scare the women and timed men and that’s all you have to do....AND IT’S WORKING!
4 posted on
01/16/2014 4:28:21 AM PST by
DH
(Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
I’ve felt that way already whenever I watch a Streep film.
5 posted on
01/16/2014 4:28:57 AM PST by
relictele
(Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The End)
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
My ‘actress’ is going to beat you up! I’m gonna make the NRA cry!
This guy actually makes movies? Streep? What a frigging hag.
6 posted on
01/16/2014 4:30:33 AM PST by
Gaffer
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
I haven’t paid to see a Streep film since “Sophie’s Choice,” and I have no plans to alter that trend, especially after her trashing of Walt Disney. These freaks aren’t happy unless they are tearing down anything that made America great.
7 posted on
01/16/2014 4:30:37 AM PST by
cld51860
(Oderint dum metuant)
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
I think Mr. Weinstein is overcompensating, if you get my drift...
8 posted on
01/16/2014 4:30:50 AM PST by
sauropod
(Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
Harvey Weinstein is a “movie mogul?” Have we devalued the term “mogul?”
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
10 posted on
01/16/2014 4:30:53 AM PST by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
Liberals spending millions on a movie no one will see. Fine with me. Less money for them to donate to Democrats.
11 posted on
01/16/2014 4:32:21 AM PST by
dirtboy
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
Weinstein you fat tub of LARD!!!
13 posted on
01/16/2014 4:35:41 AM PST by
elcid1970
("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
Guess HollyWierd should take all of the guns out of their movies first.
Pray America is Waking
14 posted on
01/16/2014 4:38:56 AM PST by
bray
(http://www.braylog.com/id47.html)
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
What do Weinstein and Streep’s armed bodyguards think about this?
Ever notice how the high-profile gun-grabbers are always themselves by people with guns?
Next Question: WHO is financing this? That info would tell you everything you need to know.
15 posted on
01/16/2014 4:41:58 AM PST by
tcrlaf
(Well, it is what the Sheeple voted for....)
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
This says more about Howard Stern than Weinstein.
16 posted on
01/16/2014 4:45:40 AM PST by
justrepublican
(Screaming a "Vexatious requester" at a Wellstone memorial...........)
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
"I dont think we need guns in this country"
Because he wants us to be just like Mexico where the innocent citizens/subjects are terrorized by drug cartels. I just heard a story on the radio about how the citizens of Michoacan Mexico have formed armed militias to fight back against the drug cartel terrorizing them (the Knights Templar, what a sick joke) and now of course the government is coming in and attempting to disarm them.
Not sure where they got the guns in the first place, but Mexico would rather have them disarmed than defending themselves of course. All in the name of safety I am sure...
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
Yawn....
This will be like most of George Looney and Matt Damion’s politically oriented tripe the past decade. Libtard critics will swoon, awards will be handed out, people will stay home in droves.
19 posted on
01/16/2014 4:59:39 AM PST by
Lee'sGhost
(Johnny Rico picked the wrong girl!)
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
If someone produced and released a movie that portrayed Harvey Weinstein as a child abusing pedophile, just to ruin him, would he agree they had a right to do it?
21 posted on
01/16/2014 5:10:40 AM PST by
WesternPacific
(The herded sheep have finally arrived at the slaughter house.)
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
Memo to criminals: Harvey Weinstien has no guns.
22 posted on
01/16/2014 5:13:14 AM PST by
lormand
(Inside every liberal is a dung slinging monkey)
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
Remember that rash of movies in 2005-2009 designed to create anti-war hysteria and defame our military?
Weinstein might consider the level of success those movies achieved before launching into this project. And he’d also be wise to think twice before disparaging the NRA. Those folks don’t play when it comes to protecting their brand.
24 posted on
01/16/2014 5:23:10 AM PST by
ScottinVA
(Obama is so far in over his head, even his ears are beneath the water level.)
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
Look, I don’t muck care for Harvey Weinstein or the Hollyweird crowd.
I’m pro second amendment and pro NRA (the country’s FIRST non profit organization).
With that said, Harvey Weinstein has produced a lot of crap films, but some terrific films, too.
And the key here is ‘produced’ he doesn’t write and direct ‘em. He’s a money man
Two examples:
The Artist - 2011.
10 Academy award nominations - five wins including Best Film -— not too shabby for a non widescreen, black and white silent film. If you have not seen it, you are truly missing a special film - great American values on display. Of course, it’s technically a French film and Hollyweirdos don’t seem to have it in them anymore.
The Kings Speech - 2010.
12 Academy award nominations - four wins including Best Film. It’s an English film and it’s wonderful. Churchill takes a pot shot (verbally) at Neville Chamberlin and England has a War winning King.
25 posted on
01/16/2014 5:27:45 AM PST by
BBB333
(Q: Which is grammatically correct? Joe Biden IS or Joe Biden ARE an idiot?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson