Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Hmmm...good to know
1 posted on 01/09/2014 8:58:27 AM PST by Lucky9teen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Lucky9teen
Little Sisters Of The Poor
2 posted on 01/09/2014 9:01:51 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper (Mia San Mia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

Ping for later


3 posted on 01/09/2014 9:02:37 AM PST by SolidRedState (I used to think bizarro world was a fiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

WHY IS FOX NEWS NOT SCREAMING THIS OUT ON THE AIRWAVES?

God have mercy I pray this is true......it will be the final downfall of ObunglerCrap because it means no funding since most folks don’t want it.


4 posted on 01/09/2014 9:02:58 AM PST by sevinufnine (A moderately bad man knows he is not very good. A thoroughly bad man thinks he's alright. C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

Well, then there is a simple solution to eliminating ObamaCare.

Eliminate the IRS. Find a more efficient, more fair and simpler taxing system. AND DownSize DC.


5 posted on 01/09/2014 9:04:00 AM PST by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

Not sure about that. The Act would seem to exempt only those federal health insurance programs created or expanded by the Act itself, which would not include ACA (Obamacare).


7 posted on 01/09/2014 9:05:11 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

Sounds similar to those who challenge the income tax as “voluntary” and the definition of income to only include rents.

The IRS still confiscates their property, no matter how “right” they are legally.


8 posted on 01/09/2014 9:05:16 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

Oh, so now Obastard’s going to start following the law?


11 posted on 01/09/2014 9:09:29 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

The section cited, Section 18115 talks about no penalty for an issuer, not an individual policy holder. This may not be the contradiction it is being portrayed as.


13 posted on 01/09/2014 9:13:12 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

One of the documents allowed under Obamacare that verifies a hardship exemption to the penalty is a shut-off notice from a utility company.

Wait to pay your bill until the electric company sends you a shut-off notice and you have verification of hardship that creates an exemption.

That’s much easier than trying to sue the government over conflicting visions of its own law - you wouldn’t win on that point anyway. The clear intent of the law, supported by Chief Roberts, allows for such a penalty.


14 posted on 01/09/2014 9:13:20 AM PST by ziravan (Choose Sides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

bump


15 posted on 01/09/2014 9:14:11 AM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

bookmark


16 posted on 01/09/2014 9:16:02 AM PST by freds6girlies (many that are first shall be last; and the last shall be first. Mt. 19:30. R.I.P. G & J)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReepers
The Obama Administration

The Wolves Are Here America! What Will You Do?

Donate To Free Republic

17 posted on 01/09/2014 9:19:30 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick

Ping. How do you, considering your knowledge of punctuation and modifiers, interpret the small blue print above?

(42 USC § 18115)


19 posted on 01/09/2014 9:21:58 AM PST by Silentgypsy (Well, let me tell you about what low gravity does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

Silly Wabbit......the law means exactly what OBUNGLES and his crew of criminals says it means. No more....No less. This law contradicts the agenda therefore this law will not be recognized as valid or even acknowledged. Refuse to submit to Omonkey’s healthcare extortion and you can be 100% certain that the lapdogs at the IRS WILL steal money from you as penalty, punishment and their perverted idea of justice.


20 posted on 01/09/2014 9:32:49 AM PST by nvscanman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen
Bttt.

5.56mm

21 posted on 01/09/2014 9:35:33 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

Oh for crying out loud - the law says you don’t HAVE to participate in a FEDERAL program. But if you don’t, then you are REQUIRED to participate in a private health plan. My God, haven’t you ever taken a logic class?


22 posted on 01/09/2014 9:39:24 AM PST by Fido969 (What's sad is most)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

I will NEVER sign up for obamacare... not gonna happen.


26 posted on 01/09/2014 10:26:19 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS! BETTER DEAD THAN RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

bookmark


27 posted on 01/09/2014 10:27:23 AM PST by Faith65 (Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

I thought Johnny Roberts had this all sorted out back in June of 2012. He decided, you’ll recall, that the individual mandate was a tax, not a penalty, and therefore constitutional after all.

This was of course exactly opposite to how Obama and the Democrats had publicly characterized it. But now comes Blabbermouth Schultz to tell us, see! There’s no penalty! It’s not a requirement. It’s merely a tax category!


30 posted on 01/09/2014 10:52:17 AM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lucky9teen

We are drowning in legalese.

The rules used to be much simpler.

.


31 posted on 01/09/2014 11:00:29 AM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson