Posted on 01/06/2014 12:33:02 PM PST by ColdOne
Self-proclaimed professional Bigfoot hunter, Rick Dyer, has finally released the photos of the hairy monster he allegedly shot and killed last year.
"Bigfoot is 100 percent real – there's no question about that," Dyer told KSAT.com.
Dyer says he shot and killed the mythical monster in a wooded area of California near Loop 1604 and Highway 151 in September 2012.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
ROTFLAMO!!!
Wish I knew how to spell that that snorting sound one makes as they try to laugh at something so ridiculous.
I gave up on reading the E-Cat fiction.
Sounded pretty kewel right up until it couldn’t be replicated and all the excuses for why suddenly appeared.
And this time it is real, not fake like the last time he did this a few years ago.
http://news.discovery.com/animals/new-bigfoot-claim-old-bigfoot-hoaxer-140106.htm
Dyer was one of two Georgia men who in 2008 claimed to have found a dead Bigfoot creature nearly 8 feet all, covered with hair and weighing 500 pounds. They released a photograph of it inside a freezer, promising DNA evidence at a press conference.
The press conference made national news, but didn’t quite live up to expectations. As National Geographic news reported:
“Only days after Georgia residents Matt Whitton and Rick Dyer told reporters at a press conference on Friday that they had a dead Bigfoot body, their evidence has been exposed as a rubber ape costume. The deception was made public by the very company Whitton and Dyer teamed up with to announce their supposed find. In a statement posted on the Web site of Searching for Bigfoot Inc., “Sasquatch Detective” Steve Kulls said he realized the Bigfoot ‘corpse’ was a fake when the frozen body began to thaw — after the press conference had already taken place.”
This time, Dyer insists, he has the real deal.
***Dyer will take the body on tour across North American where he will charge a fee to view the body.***
Back in the 1960s there was a carnival side show that had a “creature” encased in ice. You paid a fee to look at it and try to decide what it was.
I read an article about how the man shot this “creature”, dumped it in the freezer, filled it with water and claimed it was a real Bigfoot. He agreed to unfreeze it so scientists could do tests, then both he and the freezer disappeared before the unfreezing.
Dry rub or wet? reporting is not what it used to be.
Hmmmmm, this is odd because I just read this morning that Big Foot is turning 50 and is in Hawaii.
See the amazing Egress - only $2.50 for adults and $1.75 per child.
Heh. Looks like he killed one of the dwarves from the Hobbit.
I think the Navy made a real mistake not doing something like this with Bin Laden's body.
LOL! Hilarious Sir.
That said, don’t knock bigfoot, it has to be real! heh
Really, AM?
Whutchyaskeerd of
that isn’t mirrored in post #8 (which, BTW, wasn’t pulled)?
Last time I looked, the intersection of 1604 and 151 was just northwest of the city limits of San Antonio TEXAS, and I’ve never heard of any bigfoots/feets being there-is there one in California too?
A quick web search reveals articles and videos where this guy admits to being a hoaxer, claiming in one that the hoax made him, “a ton of money”. Now, I’m not sure how one makes money off of a “bigfoot hoax”, but he claims he did and if he’s done it once, I’m sure he might be motivated to do it again.
At the risk of overstating the obvious, I guess journalism just ain’t what it used to be...
WTH is that?
A Wookie???
Yeah but, yer still your high horse.
Happy New Year.
Yes but you can buy your advance reserve special charter member tickets now!
I tried shooting a Bigfoot once but I mythed.
“It’s not real until he allows professionals to examine the body and they confirm it.”
I think you are looking for the LENR/ECAT/Rossi thread.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.