Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: coloradan; Cruz_West_Paul2016

>>
The reason they changed it from “global warming” to “climate change” is because they’re not sure of the sign of the effect, i.e. heating or cooling. (Hey, the models aren’t that good.) But they are sure that we caused it and they need to both tax us and expand their own power for doing so. <<

Hotter? climate change
Colder? climate change
Milder (last hurricane season)? climate change
No discernible change? climate change

Until 25 years ago, the Earth was in a steady state with no long-term cooling or warming trends, ya see...


8 posted on 01/04/2014 5:10:14 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Fight Tapinophobia in all its forms! Do not submit to arduus privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003
The reason they changed it from “global warming” to “climate change” is because they’re not sure of the sign of the effect, i.e. heating or cooling.

"Climate change" is their transition name.

Eventually they will say "global cooling" is man-made but it's still too soon to say that after many years of saying "global warming is man-made".

27 posted on 01/04/2014 5:46:26 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003

Put in mind that they claim measurements from different parts of the Earth to argue their point. Problem? Yep, it is a problem when you’re trying to argue a global average, not just Austrailia, not just the Pacific Typhoons, not just the Atlantic hurricanes dulling, etc.


39 posted on 01/05/2014 4:50:00 AM PST by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson