Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Production of the F-16 will likely continue through 2020
F-16.net ^ | Dec 17, 2013 | lieven Dewitte

Posted on 12/17/2013 9:49:42 PM PST by Jet Jaguar

Lockheed Martin has enough orders to keep its F-16 fighter jet production line humming through the third quarter of 2017. They are also pursuing additional orders and upgrades in the Middle East, South America and other markets that would keep the line running through 2020.

Around that time, the cost of Lockheed's new F-35 stealth fighter will have dropped so far that it will make more sense for potential customers to procure F-35s rather than F-16s. Last Friday Lockheed Martin marked completion of its 100th F-35 fighter.

Lockheed has produced over 4,500 F-16s since the program began in 1975, making the F-16 the best-selling fighter jet in history. The jets are flown by 26 countries, including 15 that have placed follow-on orders, Bill McHenry, Lockheed's head of F-16 business development, said in in an interview with Reuters.

The United Arab Emirates is weighing new F-16 orders and possible upgrades, but failed to announce an order at the Dubai air show as some experts had expected.

Lockheed has dramatically scaled back production of the F-16 at its facility in Fort Worth, Texas, to about one plane a month now - from a peak production rate of 30 planes a month in June 1987, said spokesman Mark Johnson. At the moment, the company is completing work on the last one of 20 F-16s it built for Egypt. That jet and seven others are being stored at the Fort Worth plant after the United States announced it would withhold most military aid due to concerns about democracy and human rights.

It is also working on 12 F-16s for Oman, several of which are in varying states of completion at the slimmed-down F-16 production line in Building 8, also known as the "Falcon's Nest," plus a total of 36 jets ordered by Iraq. One of the 145 jets being upgraded for Taiwan is also in the factory, its nose cone already open for insertion of the new Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar. McHenry said Lockheed saw additional opportunities to upgrade existing F-16s to the new F-16V configuration, which includes the AESA radar, embedded global positioning, updated electronic warfare equipment and avionics systems.

He acknowledged that other companies, including Britain's BAE Systems, were trying to capture some of that upgrade work, but said Lockheed offered lower costs and greater economies of scale given the breadth of its existing work with the 26 countries that already operate the jet. The Pentagon last month approved a deal under which BAE will upgrade 134 older F-16 fighter jets for South Korea, a move that could pressure Lockheed to compete more aggressively in the hunt for upgrade deals.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: f16; lawndart
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 12/17/2013 9:49:43 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sparky1776; militant2; TaMoDee; freedumb2003; PERKY2004

F-16 Ping.


2 posted on 12/17/2013 9:50:42 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

“Lockheed has produced over 4,500 F-16s since the program began in 1975, making the F-16 the best-selling fighter jet in history.”

Unless of course, you count 5000+ F-4 Phantoms, 9800 F-86s, 12,000 factory and 6000 license built MiG-15s,,,


3 posted on 12/17/2013 9:56:50 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

I worked on the F16. Well I draphed schematics, we were only doing certain parts, seperated in rooms - silly really
What a great craft


4 posted on 12/17/2013 10:01:31 PM PST by svcw (Not 'hope and change' but 'dopes in chains')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

vs the F-35, the 16 is faster, accelerates harder, carries a much better load, and is much cheaper.

The F-35 is a moonpig foisted upon us with the claim of stealth covering its shortfalls. Nobody wants to buy it unless we stronger them and refuse them the F-22. We can’t hardly give it away. The world beat the door down to buy 16s.

While stealth is useful in a sense, its insane to buy a 25 or 30 year airframe based upon that. Stealth planes aren’t invisible. The radar “sees” them, but is unable to recognize them for what they are at that moment. It’s a dead certainty that the F-35 stealth will be unlocked by better computing power that is still growing at an exponential rate. Then there will be a fleet of moonpigs with low loads, low performance, and their only attribute stripped.

The F-16 still rules.


5 posted on 12/17/2013 10:06:56 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

“They are also pursuing additional orders and upgrades in the Middle East, South America and other markets that would keep the line running through 2020.”

I dunno. I suspect the F-16 could be available for a time well after that seeing as how the F-35 is a vastly more advanced aircraft and plenty of the world’s remaining air forces will not be looking to take on such a task and cost. I don’t see countries like Ecuador or Mexico or Thailand Malaysia jumping up to buy F-35s in 2020. There will need to be another option beside the F-35....maybe Super Hornet, maybe Rafale, maybe Typhoon, maybe Gripen, maybe future small Russian fighter, and, the JF-17.


6 posted on 12/17/2013 10:07:29 PM PST by FAA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

>> 6000 license built MiG-15s

Who/where?


7 posted on 12/17/2013 10:07:55 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

““Lockheed has produced over 4,500 F-16s since the program began in 1975, making the F-16 the best-selling fighter jet in history.”

I agree the numbers don’t make sense but I think they must mean in terms of dollars.


8 posted on 12/17/2013 10:10:29 PM PST by FAA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Czechoslovakia and Poland built them too. And those three the F-4, Mig-15 and F-86 were just off the top of my head. I’m kind of surprised that the writer made that claim that 4500 or so it the best selling jet fighter of all time.


9 posted on 12/17/2013 10:15:12 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FAA

Maybe, or maybe since it was designed, etc. Because in raw numbers that’s inaccurate.


10 posted on 12/17/2013 10:16:31 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FAA

In dollars it would make sense because that was an enormous seller in the 80s and 90s with tons of upgrades.


11 posted on 12/17/2013 10:17:56 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
***Around that time, the cost of Lockheed's new F-35 stealth fighter will have dropped so far that it will make more sense for potential customers to procure F-35s rather than F-16s***

That's quite a few years into the future. How can they say with any reasonable certainty what their costs will be?

12 posted on 12/17/2013 10:18:43 PM PST by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone

I hope somebody did the math.


13 posted on 12/17/2013 10:22:19 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Okay, that makes sense.

Do you happen to know the model# of the Red Bull Mig? Saw it at an air show — very nice, though, the F22 ultimately stole our respect and allegiance.


14 posted on 12/17/2013 10:23:35 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

“vs the F-35, the 16 is faster, accelerates harder, carries a much better load, and is much cheaper.

The F-35 is a moonpig foisted upon us with the claim of stealth covering its shortfalls. Nobody wants to buy it unless we stronger them and refuse them the F-22. We can’t hardly give it away. The world beat the door down to buy 16s.

While stealth is useful in a sense, its insane to buy a 25 or 30 year airframe based upon that. Stealth planes aren’t invisible. The radar “sees” them, but is unable to recognize them for what they are at that moment. It’s a dead certainty that the F-35 stealth will be unlocked by better computing power that is still growing at an exponential rate. “

Lighten up, Francis.

The F-35 is just fine. It will be very competently defending our airspaces for the next 40 years or so. It will be the tip of the spear for our offensive ops for the next 40 or so years. It has equipment that no one, not even the F-22, has. Remember that the F-22 was designed in the mid-1980s and has computing systems from the early 1990s. The F-35 is light years ahead of it in both stealth and on-board systems. Living around Fort Worth and having seen it fly, it’s a pretty physically impressive airplane. Hell of a donk. Roughly the size of a legacy Hornet with internal capacity of an F-15. They crammed a lot into that airplane and IT IS the future of U.S. manned air power no matter how much internet posters moan and cry about it.


15 posted on 12/17/2013 10:24:59 PM PST by FAA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FAA

VIMANA

Baaaaaaaaaaaabay


16 posted on 12/17/2013 11:00:47 PM PST by Therapsid (OH WELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
Merry Christmas from the Family

Robert Earl Keen - Merry Christmas to the Family

17 posted on 12/17/2013 11:13:09 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FAA

But if you recall in that Die Hard movie, Bruce Willis was able to bring down an F-35 single-handedly, and he didn’t even have a gun.


18 posted on 12/17/2013 11:21:06 PM PST by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

F-35 is an overpriced POS plain and simple. Only reason it’s moving along is by spreading the wealth for parts throughout the US to get congressional support.


19 posted on 12/18/2013 2:26:13 AM PST by maddog55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

ME-109 33,984...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_Bf_109


20 posted on 12/18/2013 2:58:13 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson