Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The SR-71 Spy Plane Was So Fast, It Outran Every Missile Fired at It
War is Boring ^ | December 5, 2013 | Dario Leone and David Cenciotti

Posted on 12/05/2013 5:28:31 AM PST by C19fan

Until Lockheed Martin finally builds the SR-72 Mach-6 spy plane it announced in November, the iconic SR-71 Blackbird, capable of flying three times the speed of sound, remains the fastest warplane ever flown operationally.

So fast that no missiles fired at it had a chance of hitting.

When the U-2 spy plane was built in the 1950s, its designer Clarence “Kelly” Johnson already knew that it would be vulnerable to enemy defenses.

(Excerpt) Read more at medium.com ...


TOPICS: History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: aerospace; blackbird; darioleone; davidcenciotti; lockheedmartin; sr71; u2; usaf; warisboring
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: G Larry
Alternatively..you can could attend a Georgia Tech football game

This flyover cost the two pilots ( Tech alums) their wings..

61 posted on 12/05/2013 8:41:02 AM PST by ken5050 (Benghazi investigation update: "The plot thickens, like Hillary Clinton's ankles.." (longfellow")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Well said. And well even before the SR, we produced the X-15.


62 posted on 12/05/2013 8:43:26 AM PST by ken5050 (Benghazi investigation update: "The plot thickens, like Hillary Clinton's ankles.." (longfellow")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Nice list, especially considering that I had always heard an F4 was designed to turn jet fuel into noise with flight as a mere side effect.

The F-4 is proof positive that you can make anything fly with a big enough engine.

63 posted on 12/05/2013 8:43:41 AM PST by IYAS9YAS (Has anyone seen my tagline? It was here yesterday. I seem to have misplaced it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Syntyr
Better to die than sound bad on the radios.

This is true.

64 posted on 12/05/2013 8:45:05 AM PST by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PIF
There is a misconception on anti-aircraft missiles.

They do not chase the target, they go to where the target
will be when they get there.

A Nike Hercules intercepted another Hercules and both were over 3000 MPH.

65 posted on 12/05/2013 8:57:29 AM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

The operation capacity J-58’s couldn’t be reached without the SR flying apart.


66 posted on 12/05/2013 9:41:50 AM PST by Despot of the Delta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I’ve been wanting to go there for years. You just sealed the deal!


67 posted on 12/05/2013 10:39:52 AM PST by uncommonsense (Liberals see what they believe; Conservatives believe what they see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: saleman

Think Saturn V. Saw Apollo 14 on the pad two days before launch God I wish I could have been there for the launch, friends said it was awesome who live near the Cape.


68 posted on 12/05/2013 12:18:58 PM PST by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Syntyr

Great stuff!!


69 posted on 12/05/2013 12:23:59 PM PST by bobby.223 (Retired up in the snowy mountains of the American Redoubt and it's a GREAT life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Syntyr

That was a great story from Sled Driver. Thanks for posting that. I’m going to have to go back and read that book again, and remember when I was proud to be an American.


70 posted on 12/05/2013 12:52:04 PM PST by backwoods-engineer (Blog: www.BackwoodsEngineer.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan; Dan(9698)

Maybe it didn’t fly at mach 5, but then it must not have done 3,500kts either. Just going by what others claimed it’s speed was.

Predictions are just that. Not a certainty. Maybe it will catch up at the right intersection, maybe not, Pilots have a funny way of being unpredictable in such a situation.


71 posted on 12/05/2013 12:59:04 PM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: smaug6

kts = nautical miles per hour.


72 posted on 12/05/2013 1:02:53 PM PST by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

“I know a retired flight traffic controller who clocked it at 3500kts. Go figure.”

3500kts is way past Mach 3. Is he sure it was an SR-71 ?


73 posted on 12/05/2013 1:06:09 PM PST by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite; Jack Hydrazine

No 3500 kph (kilometers per hour) is about 2175 mph. That might be what he meant.


74 posted on 12/05/2013 1:08:58 PM PST by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

No = now,


75 posted on 12/05/2013 1:10:10 PM PST by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: PIF

We call those sea stories. A bit of exageration improves the telling.

I used to teach SAM avoidance. The inability to fly over SAM sites is what ended the B-58, the B-70, and ultimately changed the B-1A into the B-1B.


76 posted on 12/05/2013 1:12:49 PM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

With the exception of the radio equipment that I didn’t have, you just described word for word the flyby at Edwards AFB, I think in the late 1980s. Great memory ... thanks!


77 posted on 12/05/2013 2:30:12 PM PST by Fast Moving Angel (A moral wrong is not a civil right: No religious sanction of an irreligious act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

Nope. He specifically said 3500 knots per hour.


78 posted on 12/05/2013 7:58:42 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; me = independent conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

Yes, it was the SR-71 he tracked on his radar.


79 posted on 12/05/2013 7:59:15 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; me = independent conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Syntyr
Outstanding .. thanks !    d:^)
80 posted on 12/05/2013 8:09:15 PM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson