[Tainan]

I will apologize and say the the "HEY PECKERHEAD" was over the top and not a polite way of responding to you.
Fo that part - -- I sincerely do apologize.
Rather ironic, and somewhat hypocritical of me to use an epithet such as that as I am one "those people" who have bemoaned the increasing lack of civility on FR over the last several years. And I find myself posting an uncivil comment such as that.

Ironic also, in that I agree with the basic gist of your post #105. What I did disagree with was the snark in the post.
such as:
"... I can only say you are very ignorant...."

Which, of course, could simply mean 'ignorant' in the lack of knowledge...but..
"...even Dawkins would call you a fool for the claims you make."

and...
"But then again, you would rather do this over mail so that the proof of your ignorance will never be seen by those who are not up to par enough to take you and your pathetic attempt at discrediting the Bible on."

Displays a marked lack of civility as well. However, I should not have responded in kind.
As I mentioned, I do agree with your comments on Biblical veracity; and I do applaud your defense of the Scriptures.
It is the 'snark' employed to make your points that prompted my crude reply.
I should not have sunk to that level. My apologies.

[Elsie]

Oh my goodness; you’ve outed ME!

I, too, have lapsed at times; but I hope they are getting farther and farther apart.

[Elsie]

[OneVike]

Apology accepted, and I extend the same to you for my, as you put it, my snark response.

It is a character flaw that I try to reign in, usually with little success.

Thank God He is greater than I am and forgave me long before I was a glimmer in my parents eyes.