[bigheadfred]

no and F*** NO

[rockrr]

If they allow fags to donate they will irreparably contaminate the supply and it will need to be destroyed. It WILL be destroyed - all of it.

[The_Media_never_lie]

PC insanity.

[Yosemitest]

It tainted the blood platelet supply and then the "Hepatitis" outbreak began.

This is what we get when we FAIL to OBEY God.
For it is written:

“ For whosoever shall commit ANY of these abominations,
even the SOULS that commit them
SHALL BE CUT OFF from among their people. ”

Those who support homosexuals are against our Heavenly Father and His Son Jesus Christ.
These anti Christ people only bring destruction on us ALL.
I have NO sympathy for homosexuals!

Homosexuality is a "Mark" of disobedience.

It was given by our Heavenly Father to test us
to see ... if we will OBEY our Heavenly Father,
and abide by His commandments, statues, and ordinances.

Someone once asked

"Why are they [homosexuals] all so angry?"

The answer is in the definition of "REPROBATE".

rep·ro·bate \ˈre-prə-ˌbāt\ a. [L. reprobatus, reprobo, to disallow; re and probo, to prove.]

1. Not enduring proof or trial; not of standard purity or fineness; disallowed; rejected.


Reprobate silver shall men call them, because the Lord hath rejected them. Jer. 6.




2. Abandoned in sin; lost to virtue or grace.

They profess that they know God, but in works deny him, being abominable and disobedient, and to every good work reprobate. Titus 1.

3. Abandoned to error, or in apostasy. 2Tim. 3.

And the reason"why" is given in the Bible.

God has a cure for homosexuals.

But will we OBEY our Heavenly Father?

"Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect
that God is just,
that his justice cannot sleep forever."

[RC one]

unbelievable. why not let IV drug abusers donate too?

[BitWielder1]

Why don't we import blood from Africa while we're at it?

[count-your-change]

If a person doesn’t take blood transfusions then they won’t have that possibility of contracting AIDS.

[Carbonsteel]

As long as it takes to detect HIV after exposure, to allow a segment of the population with the high HIV transmission rates to donate blood is pure insanity.

The stupidity of this once great nation never ceases to amaze me.

[ottbmare]

Can someone explain why they would even want to donate blood? Donating blood is not my favorite sport.

[TADSLOS]

There’s nothing “gay” about deliberately risking others to their self abused poisoned blood.

[Darksheare]

How else will the ghouls who want to reduce the population by 80% realize their Utopian dreams except by poisoning people at the hospital with viral lingering death?
I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that is the intended outcome.

[Standing Wolf]

What difference, at this point, does it make? The commoners don’t need blood transfusions, anyway.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

They only ask questions for which they have already decided the answer.

[PGR88]

Now people are claiming the “right” to donate blood. And they are taken seriously. What an odd country we are becoming.

[DemforBush]

A couple of quick thoughts here:

-HIV is the focus here, but it should be noted that the CDC’s numbers for gay/bi men regarding syphilis are almost identical to those for HIV. Syphilis can be just as much a killer as HIV.

-I would answer the argument for the justification for lifting the ban (i.e. we know more about the HIV virus, and can test for it better) with this question. If we allow gay men to donate blood when they are so high-risk, why not drop ALL restrictions? I mean, we can test the blood of shared needle drug users, men who have paid prostitutes for sex, and people who hail from certain sub-Saharan African nations (all three of which are forbidden to donate for the same basic reasons as gay men) just as easily as that of a gay man. Somehow, I think the advocates would be hard-pressed to come up with a good answer for that one.

-If it were really about anti-gay discrimination, the ban would extend to lesbians. It does not, as lesbians present a very low HIV risk. The bias argument holds no merit except in the minds of gay activists and brainwashed students who think diversity should trump sound medical policy.

[JT Hatter]

I’m working on my 11th gallon go good old American red blood. If they let homosexuals contaminate the supply, I’ll quit giving.

[Jack Hydrazine]

In related news...

CDC: 62 Percent Of HIV-Positive Men Have Unprotected Sex
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3097846/posts

Wisconsin DNR Struggling To Curb Sex At Nude Beach
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3097583/posts

Gay men push to end 30-year blood donation ban
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3097348/posts

[Jack Hydrazine]

In fact, “CDC estimates that MSM represent approximated 4 percent of the male population in the United States, but male-to-male sex accounted for more than three-fourths (78 percent) of new HIV infections among men and nearly two-thirds (63 percent) of all new infections in 2010.”

[Jack Hydrazine]

I remember reading about this in the news a couple of years ago.

[Star Traveler]

If someone was intent on massively spreading HIV throughout the population in this country - this is the way you would do it - by infecting the blood supply.