Posted on 11/22/2013 3:56:56 PM PST by B4Ranch
November 22, 2013, is the 50th anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. The true story of JFK's murder has never been officially admitted, although the conclusion that JFK was murdered by a plot involving the Secret Service, the CIA and the Joint Chiefs of Staff has been well established by years of research, such as that provided by James W. Douglass in his book, JFK And The Unspeakable, published by Simon & Schuster in 2008. Ignore Douglass's interest in the Trappist monk Thomas Merton and Merton's prediction and focus on the heavily documented research that Douglass provides.
Or just turn to the contemporary films, taken by tourists watching JFK's motorcade that are available on YouTube, which show clearly the Secret Service pulled from President Kennedy's limo just prior to his assassination, and the Zapruder film that shows the killing shot to have come from President Kennedy's right front, blowing off the back of his head, not from the rear as postulated in the Warren Commission Report, which would have pushed his head forward, not rearward.
I am not going to write about the assassination to the extent that the massive information permits. Those who want to know already know. Those who cannot face the music will never be able to confront the facts regardless of what I or anyone else writes or reveals.
To briefly review, the facts are conclusive that JFK was on terrible terms with the CIA and the Joint Chiefs. He had refused to support the CIA organized Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba. He had rejected the Joint Chiefs' "Operation Northwoods," a plan to commit real and faked acts of violence against Americans, blame Castro and use the false-flag events to bring regime change to Cuba. He had rejected the Joint Chiefs case that the Soviet Union should be attacked while the US held the advantage and before the Soviets could develop delivery systems for nuclear weapons. He had indicated that after his reelection he was going to pull US troops out of Vietnam and that he was going to break the CIA into a thousand pieces. He had aroused suspicion by working behind the scenes with Khrushchev to defuse the Cuban Missile Crisis, leading to claims that he was "soft on communism." The CIA and Joint Chiefs' belief that JFK was an unreliable ally in the war against communism spread into the Secret Service.
It has been established that the original autopsy of JFK's fatal head wound was discarded and a faked one substituted in order to support the official story that Oswald shot JFK from behind. FBI director J. Edgar Hoover and President Johnson knew that Oswald was the CIA's patsy, but they also understood, as did members of the Warren Commission, that to let the true story out would cause Americans to lose confidence in their own government at the height of the Cold War.
Robert Kennedy knew what had happened. He was on his way to being elected president and to holding the plotters accountable for the murder of his brother when the CIA assassinated him. A distinguished journalist, who was standing behind Robert Kennedy at the time of his assassination, told me that the killing shots came from behind past his ear. He submitted his report to the FBI and was never contacted.
Acoustic experts have conclusively demonstrated that more shots were fired than can be accounted for by Sirhan Sirhan's pistol and that the sounds indicate two different calibers of firearms.
I never cease to be amazed by the gullibility of Americans, who know nothing about either event, but who confidently dismiss the factual evidence provided by experts and historians on the basis of their naive belief that "the government wouldn't lie about such important events" or "someone would have talked." What good would it do if someone talked when the gullible won't believe hard evidence?
This story courtesy of PaulCraigRoberts.org.
Holy sweet mother of God! You don’t know that Oswald was a commie and WENT TO LIVE IN RUSSIA AND HAD A RUSSIAN WIFE AND A RUSSIAN JOB, WHILE LIVING IN RUSSIA WITH COMMUNIST RUSSIANS?
What is really one of the great ironies of history is that, without voter fraud, Kennedy would not have been president. Had he kept himself in shape, avoided a heart attack or cancer, and not contracted a deadly STD, he could possibly still be alive today at the ripe old age of 96.
I would assume that's true with the CIA; however, both JFK and RFK were very close with Gen. Max Taylor, who was CJCS from 62 to 64. RFK named one of his sons Matthew Maxwell Taylor Kennedy. Families tend to not name children after people they're on "bad terms" with.
The CIA, KGB, and Harper Valley PTA made sure it did not get published.
If you want the truth, you must see Bubba Ho-tep.
JFK Assassination:
More navel gazing by a mostly lefty aging baby boomer media.
Quite frankly, I really DO NOT want to hear about the coming 50 year anniversary’s of other baby boomer events like Beatlemania, Woodstock and Vietnam war protests.
Baby Boomers time in the spotlight has been way too long....
As someone said: a mid century Anthony Weiner at best.
Very well said....
Yawn.
Will Rogers is dead too.
Also Winston Churchill.
I read that, years ago, and it made absolute sense.
bttt
I’ve never seen that pic before, but your story makes more sense than all of the 50 years of BS that has been laid on us. I don’t believe that Kennedy was shot by Oswald with a crapass Italian military surplus bolt action rifle. I have one of the same Carcano rifles and there is no way to do that shot.
There are TWO WAYS to determine the timing of the shots that were fired that day.
1. Nearly everyone on Earth believes method #1 to be valid and not altered
2. Method #2 was viciously attacked by the US government after experts said it looked valid. But instead of doing another experiment which would have PROVEN what happened, the US government said they ran out of money and shut the investigation down.
So you have TWO methods. Anyone with an IQ approaching room temperature should understand that if the time between shots is the same in BOTH, then that means they are BOTH likely valid.
I wrote a book to show that the time between shots is the same which means several things:
1. A conspiracy killed JFK
2. It wasn't a couple of bubbas, it took real power in the US government to fix the investigations to keep the truth hidden
You don't have to read the book, I wrote it to document that there is a way to show what happened. It's a bit complicated for most, you can't just look at Vince Bugliosi's book RECLAIMING HISTORY and figure it out. You have to understand and correct the honest errors that were made and identify the forged evidence. But there is an easier way: Do not use ANYTHING THE US Government provided as evidence. Use only evidence the US government could not have forged, then you can easily solve the biggest murder mystery in history.
Solving the biggest mystery in history
Over a thousand books are looking for a consistent story but they can't find it because they will not consider that the conspiracy that killed JFK was from high in the US government. The US government even today will tell any lie to hide the truth.
I agree. When I see these JFK conspiracy theories on public access TV, I think, “Get a life, bozos.”
Intact and barely damaged isn’t true. The pic in common circulation shows the bullet in profile and from that angle it looks almost pristine. But seen from the end the bullet is flattened to the point where the lead core is starting to extrude from the outer jacket. It took a lot of force to flatten it like that.
As for an exploding bullet...the energy of a fast moving round can make things explode without the round itself needing to explode.
I used to think he had Mad Cow, now I’m thinking maybe Tertiary Syphilis.
there is a way to PROVE what happened during the shooting. Many have tried this method but they have not corrected a few honest mistakes nor have they identified and removed the lies made to hide the truth. IF you were going to investigate the possibility that the US government was involved, would you use ANY of the evidence the conspirators in the government provided? Of course not but that is a fundamental mistake all of the authors make.
Once you know when Connally was shot in the back, you can know WHO was behind the murder with just a bit more work. It really is much easier than you'll believe until you prove it to yourself that the truth can be known. Don't take my word for anything, verify what you see and it will become clearer how easy it is to lie to Americans.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.