Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

City Where It's Now Illegal to Smoke in Your Own Home
AOL ^ | 11-20-13 | Alan Farnham

Posted on 11/22/2013 10:01:45 AM PST by TurboZamboni

The town of San Rafael, Calif., has passed a ban on smoking that city officials have called the most stringent in the nation. The new ordinance makes it illegal for residents to smoke in their own homes if they share a wall with another dwelling. The ban applies to owners and renters alike, and it covers condominiums, co-ops, apartments and any multi-family residence containing three or more units.

Rebecca Woodbury, an analyst at the San Rafael City Manager's office, helped craft the ban, which took effect Nov.14. "We based it on a county ordinance," she told ABC News, "but we modified it, and ended up making it the strictest. I'm not aware of any ordinance that's stronger." Cities with similar but less severe smoking restrictions include Cambridge, Mass., and other California cities, including Walnut Creek and Tiburon.

(Excerpt) Read more at realestate.aol.com ...


TOPICS: Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: antitobaccoscam; bullystate; kalifornia; scam; smoking; smokingiscool
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
Years ago, he said, when restrictions on smoking were first introduced, "the spirit of the legislation was supposedly to protect people who did not want to be exposed to smoke." Today, he said, the motivating spirit had changed: People disapprove of the habit, and wish to restrict it whether or not it affects them directly.
1 posted on 11/22/2013 10:01:46 AM PST by TurboZamboni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

So. The solution here is to step outside on your porch or balcony and smoke away.

Ooops. I’m sure they have laws against that too.


2 posted on 11/22/2013 10:06:13 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

I guarantee you this will only be enforced on white, middle-class taxpayers. Can you see them trying to enforce it on the illegals living in those types of dwellings?


3 posted on 11/22/2013 10:06:22 AM PST by IYAS9YAS (Has anyone seen my tagline? It was here yesterday. I seem to have misplaced it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

If they try to prohibit the smoking of marijuana there will be hell to pay.


4 posted on 11/22/2013 10:07:24 AM PST by forgotten man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni
It's much easier in today's world to just be a criminal.

/johnny

5 posted on 11/22/2013 10:08:30 AM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

I can’t imagine living in a “house” that shares walls.


6 posted on 11/22/2013 10:08:32 AM PST by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

It’s much easier in today’s world to just be a criminal.

/johnny

It certainly is. You and I are probably breaking several right now.

Wasn’t there a thing about “ex post facto” laws in this country, something like that?


7 posted on 11/22/2013 10:10:24 AM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
The ordinance cites such studies, plus a 2011 study by UCLA that found that California property owners paid up to $18 million a year to clean apartments vacated by tenants who'd smoked.

Boo freaking hoo. I'm sure the owners collected twice that amount in forfeited damage deposits when the smokers moved out. If not - then its their own fault.

8 posted on 11/22/2013 10:10:33 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni
Today, he said, the motivating spirit had changed: People disapprove of the habit, and wish to restrict it whether or not it affects them directly.

That has ALWAYS been the motive behind the bans.

9 posted on 11/22/2013 10:11:12 AM PST by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni
The Left's "lifeboat" conception of healthcare will lead to an infinity of such interventions into our private lives. If "everyone" is paying for healthcare then "everyone" has a stake in how you conduct yourself and, thus, has a "right" to tell you what you can and can't ingest, what you can and can't weigh, how much sun you must or must not get, what medications you may or may not have, what surgery you may or may not receive, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera,... Universal healthcare is the key to universal control.
10 posted on 11/22/2013 10:11:47 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve

A a Duplex is shaped like an ordinary house (sometimes converted from a one-family house) and so it does share walls with another tenant.


11 posted on 11/22/2013 10:11:58 AM PST by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS

Does San Rafael have any housing projects where we can expect enforcement?

Seriously, while I’m not a smoker, I’d take it up and dare them to come and get me. Yet people will not do anything and simply surrender their Consitutional right and allow the government to encroach on legal activity within their own home.

When do they start cracking down on home Bible studies?


12 posted on 11/22/2013 10:12:54 AM PST by Obadiah (I Like Ted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

You cannot smoke within 15 feet [I think that’s the amount] of a window or door. The smoke blows right in.


13 posted on 11/22/2013 10:16:14 AM PST by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

Three Felonies A Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent
http://www.amazon.com/Three-Felonies-Day-Target-Innocent/dp/1594035229/


14 posted on 11/22/2013 10:16:41 AM PST by listenhillary (Courts, law enforcement, roads and national defense should be the extent of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
Here in MN, leftists are tring to ban e-cigs as well.

They just look like smoking.

15 posted on 11/22/2013 10:17:10 AM PST by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve

Townhouses, condominiums.


16 posted on 11/22/2013 10:17:14 AM PST by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

Home: No place for Bible study

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2256793/posts

guess that state...


17 posted on 11/22/2013 10:18:56 AM PST by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

The leftists and their big Pharma backers are trying to get the e-cigs banned in the U.S. period.


18 posted on 11/22/2013 10:21:47 AM PST by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

when govt makes everything illegal, eveyone’s a criminal.

since law-abiding people haven’t voluntarily turned into criminals so govt can come after them,

they have forced govt to make more and more things illegal so they have a pretext to go after them.

law isnt used for justice anymore.


19 posted on 11/22/2013 10:22:28 AM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

IIRC, Phizer makes Chantix and a type of e-cig.

They’re probably paying off legislators.


20 posted on 11/22/2013 10:22:51 AM PST by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson