Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The evolution of beauty: Face the facts
The Economist ^ | November 16, 2013 | The Economist

Posted on 11/14/2013 11:16:02 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 11/14/2013 11:16:03 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Is Russian fur beautiful?

Enquiring minds want to know.


2 posted on 11/14/2013 11:27:03 AM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
BEAUTY, the saying has it, is only skin deep. Not true. Skin is important (the cosmetics industry proves that). But so is what lies under it. In particular, the shape of people’s faces, determined by their bone structure, contributes enormously to how beautiful they are. And, since the ultimate point of beauty is to signal who is a good prospect as a mate, what makes a face beautiful is not only an aesthetic matter but also a biological one. How those bone structures arise, and how they communicate desirable traits, are big evolutionary questions.

Sanford
"Beauty is only skin deep.
But ugliness goes right down to the marrow!"

3 posted on 11/14/2013 11:30:37 AM PST by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The answer to your question is....sure.


4 posted on 11/14/2013 11:32:12 AM PST by nascarnation (Baraq's 3rd term: squaw Warren? Lord help us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Yes.....only the truly beautiful are having children. Like that lady who was yelling about who was going to take care of her what, dozen kids?


5 posted on 11/14/2013 12:11:52 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The thing I have always loved - as in eating massive amounts of popcorn, drinking beer and laughing my ass off - about the social sciences, is how they treat data definitions.

In the hard sciences, you can find books - entire books - compiled by hundreds of scientists all over the world over decades, that drill down on the precise definitions of single word terms that are used for data in scientific studies. Mathematical charts, arguments, diagrams, philosophies. And why? Because the data is what is used to determin the science, so the definition of the data is utterly crucial.

But in social science, these “scientists” wave their hands and talk about “beauty” and “desirability” and other vagueries and then thrown in hard science “genetics” and voila’ - a published paper that AMCNBCCBS vomits out in the news and everyone freaks out about.

Grudgingly, over the years, I have had to acknowledge that statistical analysis does provide a basis for the social sciences - barely. Because there are more ways to abuse statistics then there are to use them properly. And you’re still stuck with deciding what data you are going to statistically crunch.

But hey, ignoring these issues mean that yes, you too can get a multi-million dollar government grant to “prove” that beautiful women attract men more than ugly women. Oops, see? I said ugly. No PC DemonRat grant for me.


6 posted on 11/14/2013 12:13:44 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Another researcher studied police photographs of children who had been abused and found such children had lower craniofacial ratios than those who had not been.

beaten with "the ugly stick", undoubtedly.

7 posted on 11/14/2013 12:21:15 PM PST by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation; BenLurkin
I am thinking more along these lines:


8 posted on 11/14/2013 12:29:27 PM PST by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

I like the way you think.


9 posted on 11/14/2013 12:33:23 PM PST by Anton.Rutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala
очень красиво
10 posted on 11/14/2013 12:33:39 PM PST by nascarnation (Baraq's 3rd term: squaw Warren? Lord help us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Most ochen indeed! :D


11 posted on 11/14/2013 1:07:14 PM PST by Oberon (John 12:5-6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
Я ударил его.
12 posted on 11/14/2013 1:08:28 PM PST by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Even as children, according to 33 separate studies, the attractive are better adjusted and more popular than the ugly (they also have higher intelligence, which assists social skills).

Wow. I wonder what the definition of "better adjusted" means. I've never met a truly beautiful person that wasn't an ass who though the world revolved around them. Might they be more popular? Sure culture and instinct would make that true. Is popularity really a measure of anything important?

What study has ever shown that "the attractive" are more intelligent than the "less attractive". I have never seen a study that shows this realistically. I've attended Mensa meetings that indicates the opposite. Of course I've never met "an attractive person" that didn't think they were brilliant though.

I suspect there is a lot of shading being done here to define "attractive" and "ugly". In other words I suspect that anyone that isn't malformed and hideous is considered "attractive" when it comes to IQ, where the "ugly" is anyone that isn't "very attractive" when it comes to being popular.

13 posted on 11/14/2013 1:14:11 PM PST by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Another researcher studied police photographs of children who had been abused and found such children had lower craniofacial ratios than those who had not been.

So being slapped around tends to lower your attractiveness?

Who knew?

(Yes this is sarcasm)

14 posted on 11/14/2013 1:19:03 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

Devushka! Ana ochen krassivaya!


15 posted on 11/14/2013 2:15:29 PM PST by elcid1970 ("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Not bad.


16 posted on 11/14/2013 2:21:12 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

“Come and keep your comrade warm.”


17 posted on 11/14/2013 2:22:52 PM PST by dfwgator (Fire Muschamp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

http://www.johnspeedie.com/healy/Ooo-eee.wav


18 posted on 11/14/2013 2:23:10 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

19 posted on 11/14/2013 2:25:35 PM PST by dfwgator (Fire Muschamp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

there might be something to it...no attractive men in prison. They all look ugly...


20 posted on 11/14/2013 2:34:21 PM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson