I’ve noticed in the offices I’ve worked in that there are three types of people.
1. Men
2. Women
3. Generic people.
I can pretty much tell which women in my building see themselves as a person that works in the building and which ones see themselves as a WOMAN that happens to work in the building. Same with men, but I notice the women most, mainly because I seem to make more eye contact with them.
And I discovered something: A mildly or not really very attractive woman that sees herself as a “woman” and acts and dresses accordingly is actually more “sexy” than a very attractive woman that just throws a comb through her hair and shows up. It’s not just dress. They MOVE differently. It’s a lot more than just their physique.
But my wife thinks I over analyze this stuff. Ya think!
You are quite right.
However, IMO generic people should be those who show up for work. I have no interest in adding sexual tensions to the workplace. It’s great in its place, which is not on the job.
You are quite right.
However, IMO generic people should be those who show up for work. I have no interest in adding sexual tensions to the workplace. It’s great in its place, which is not on the job.
“I’ve noticed in the offices I’ve worked in...”
I did a three week install at Victoria’s Secrets headquarters. Up close and in person, the “girls” were ugly, sickly, mean, and dumb — every one of them. I think they knew there careers were over at twenty years of age. Most of the other staff ladies — receptionists etc., were very attractive, nice, and healthy. There were very few men working there.
Oh, and back to the subject, the “girls” had no breasts.
They don't necessarily dress sexy but you can tell they are comfortable with who they are.
I am going to generalize and say those women have or have had a guy in their life that they think the world of and who thinks the world of them.