Skip to comments.After Redistribution of Wealth and Healthcare, what is next?
Posted on 10/17/2013 3:49:44 AM PDT by epluribus_2
After Redistribution of Wealth and Healthcare, what is next? Housing? Food? Clothing? Maybe even a bigger dream - redistribution of our land to the rest of the world.
Expect to see every bat-shit crazy idea ever espoused by the most rabid of his cult to be implemented.
All this won't go unanswered, but we will find out exactly what those trillion rounds of ammo the DHS et al purchased are for.
What is next? I was just listening to Daniel 12 before I got into the parking lot...
I’m sort of taking an “evil must reach it’s full fruition, and then the end will come” attitude about this whole thing. It’s just that nobody wants to be one of those alive when it happens. Kinda like when the sun blows up. You don’t think about it much because you probably won’t be there when it happens.
But it’s a bummer when you are.
But Obamacare is imploding.
Now that Obama has effective control of the debt limit, he and his ilk will MAKE it work. QE to the tune of $85Billion per month will be nothing like what he’ll do to pump up Obamacare and keep his new constituents voting (if we even have them any more after 2014).
“what is next?”
We’re already redistributing food. Food Stamps
Coming after retirement accounts like TSPs and IRAs. Bank on it.
According to statistics, the Federal Government owns approximately 728.8 million acres and is the largest land owner in the United States.
The Federal Government does not ‘own’ anything. How should this US land be returned to its citizens????
If they are going to plunge us headlong into socialist dependency then let’s go all the way. Let’s cloward liven them and all get on the system til it crashes. Demand services. Produce nothing.
“Bank on it.”
The irony of this idiom is delicious!
Freepers, you need to understand and cite Federalist 10 (James Madison), part of what reads:
From this view of the subject it may be concluded that a pure democracy, by which I mean a society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the government in person, can admit of no cure for the mischiefs of faction. A common passion or interest will, in almost every case, be felt by a majority of the whole; a communication and concert result from the form of government itself; and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual. Hence it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths. Theoretic politicians, who have patronized this species of government, have erroneously supposed that by reducing mankind to a perfect equality in their political rights, they would, at the same time, be perfectly equalized and assimilated in their possessions, their opinions, and their passions.
We can finally retire “It’s George Bush’s Fault” and move on to the bold future of “It’s Ted Cruz’s Fault”
Substitute Wealth for land and that is what Amnesty is. The wealth of America is being redistributed to the world and to the Banks and to politicians.
Control of food
Control of water
Control of electricty
You figure out the rest...none of it boades well for US..
Let’s borrow another $20 trillion or so from the Chinese that we can’t ever pay back. Our land will be redistributed then.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.