Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The original Kodak moment: Snapshots taken from the camera that changed photography in 1888
The Daily Mail ^ | 10-1-13 | Jill Reilly

Posted on 10/01/2013 8:06:09 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic

Kodak may have hit hard times in recent years, but 120 years ago it was the pioneer of home photography.

In 1888 it created the Kodak No.1, which gave consumers a chance to capture relaxed scenes which had previously only been taken by professional photographers.

These snapshots taken by amateurs give a charming insight into everyday life in the 19th century.

It was simple to use - users would simply point in the direction of their subject, although it was a guessing game as there was not a viewfinder yet, reports Gizmodo.

They would then wind the film, open the shutter, and press a button to actually capture the picture.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Business/Economy; History
KEYWORDS: business; history; kodak; media; photography
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
Comment #1 Removed by Moderator

To: afraidfortherepublic; SWAMPSNIPER

ping!


2 posted on 10/01/2013 8:06:56 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic; SWAMPSNIPER

ping!


3 posted on 10/01/2013 8:06:56 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Is there one of Moochelle twerking?


4 posted on 10/01/2013 8:10:23 AM PDT by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "St.Sarah, the1Tru Conservative that REFUSES to unite us and Save America"you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

‘You press the button, we do the rest’

Some comic did a funny bit about how people act when you hand them your camera to take a picture. “What do I do? What do I press?”

IT’S THE SILVER BUTTON ON THE TOP RIGHT!!! Same place it’s been for 130 years!!!!


5 posted on 10/01/2013 8:14:18 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Quite an article. The look into the past is fascinating. Just how much of their time did upper class women spend dressing. Were they, and the men, trying to make themselves uncomfortable. Hot weather must have been difficult.


6 posted on 10/01/2013 8:14:40 AM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

I think a number of those photos were taken on Sundays. But, also, people cared more about how they dressed back in the day unlike today. If they could see us today they’d think we look like a bunch of slobs.


7 posted on 10/01/2013 8:16:19 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (IÂ’m not a Republican, I'm a Conservative! Pubbies haven't been conservative since before T.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Great article. It sure would be nice if the state-run media complex in the USA would write articles as well as this one.


8 posted on 10/01/2013 8:17:14 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (IÂ’m not a Republican, I'm a Conservative! Pubbies haven't been conservative since before T.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

If they could see us today, they’d think we were insane.

Except for me, in my Dalek “Exterminate!” t-shirt.


9 posted on 10/01/2013 8:19:26 AM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Obama: the bearded lady of the Muslim Brotherhood))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

In before the Linda Eastman ruined the Beatles posts!


10 posted on 10/01/2013 8:21:43 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
as true today as back then


11 posted on 10/01/2013 8:22:27 AM PDT by llevrok (Democrats are LAW-LESS because the GOP is Ball-Less)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

How much time did they spend IRONING? Of course, most households had a “hired girl” to do that, but still. Have you ever been to a museum, or an old estate, and visited the laundry to see the old horrid devices used to achieve those starched and pressed fashions?

Even the maids’ uniforms had to be carefully pressed and pleated, including the aprons and the hats. And there was no such thing as ‘wash and wear’ fabric in those days either.


12 posted on 10/01/2013 8:22:36 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Downfall: Years later Kodak ... failed to quickly embrace modern technologies such as digital photography, its own invention.
Kodak also "failed to embrace" other technologies ... they turned down Edwin Land's idea of an instant camera so he created Polaroid.
Also turned down Chester Carlson's idea for a copying machine, which led to Xerox.
Duh.
13 posted on 10/01/2013 8:23:18 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hardraade
If they could see us today, they’d think we were insane.

They may be right.


14 posted on 10/01/2013 8:24:12 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

It’s called the “not invented here” syndrome.


15 posted on 10/01/2013 8:26:53 AM PDT by OregonRancher (Some days, it's not even worth chewing through the restraints)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Apparently, people were a lot thinner back then.


16 posted on 10/01/2013 8:27:53 AM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Was in the car with my daughter yesterday and Paul Simon's Kodachrome came on the radio.

Suddenly it dawned on me that people her age have absolutely not a clue what this song is about.


17 posted on 10/01/2013 8:28:17 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA; Jack Hydrazine

Antique pleating iron used for collars and cuffs.

18 posted on 10/01/2013 8:28:29 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven
Faulting Kodak for not getting into the digital CAMERA business is like faulting Ford for not making boats and airplanes.

Transparencies (film, slides, and reproduction), chemistry, paper, this was their trade. They did make cameras but it was to push the repeat business of processing.

They SHOULD have pushed digital publishing as Blurb and others have done. Rather than compete with dozens of camera manufacturers (each line of which is obsolete technology withing 2 years), they could have been pushing products for the tens of thousands of photos each person is now shooting. MILLIONS of images.

19 posted on 10/01/2013 8:29:00 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Great pictures, thanks for posting!


20 posted on 10/01/2013 8:33:37 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson