USCIS Scrubs Webpage Confirming Native-Born And Natural-Born Are Separate Subsets Of Citizen.

U.S. Citizenship And Immigration Services ^ | 9-5-2013 | Cold Case Posse Supporter

[Cold Case Posse Supporter]

Back on April 2, 2013 I posted a thread titled 'Listen Up: Here Is Proof Native-Born Citizens And Natural-Born Citizens Are Separate'. In that thread I provided a link to the U.S. Citizenship And Immigration Services website page that stated the following:

The Immigration and Naturalization Service:

“Interpretation 324.2 Reacquisition of citizenship lost by marriage.”

Interpretation 324.2(a)(7):

“(7) Restoration of citizenship is prospective . Restoration to citizenship under any one of the three statutes is not regarded as having erased the period of alienage that immediately preceded it.

The words “shall be deemed to be a citizen of the United States to the same extent as though her marriage to said alien had taken place on or after September 22, 1922″, as they appeared in the 1936 and 1940 statutes, are prospective and restore the status of native-born or natural-born citizen as of the date citizenship was reacquired.”

Interpretation 324.2:

“The effect of naturalization under the above statutes was not to erase the previous period of alienage, but to restore the person to the status IF NATURALIZED, NATIVE, OR NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN, as determined by her status prior to loss.”

The link to the above was this: http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-45077/0-0-0-48575.html

When you click on it now it reads:

[404 - Requested Page Not Found on Site

The page you requested is not on our site.

Please look for related information on the USCIS Home Page.

Sorry for any inconvenience.]

The above webpage confirmed the federal government recognizes and routinely restores 3 different statuses of U.S. citizenship:

1) Naturalized Citizen 2) Native Citizen (as Obama's campaign and the DNC refer to Obama) 3) The Constitutionally eligible Natural Born Citizen that Article 2 Section 1 calls for to be Commander-in-Chief.

For some reason, that webpage has been scrubbed. The question is why?

[Cold Case Posse Supporter]

I am wondering if the webpage was scrubbed because Sheriff Arpaio's Cold Case Posse's evidence on Obama's fraudulent birth certificate and birth origins have been distributed to multiple Congressmen recently at town hall meetings? If true, it might explain why the proof showing Native-Born Citizens and Natural-Born Citizens would be scrubbed.

If you recall in 2008 on Obama's own campaign website Fight The Smears, it stated:

'The truth is, Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native citizen of the United States of America.'

Does Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution specifically call for a native born Citizen to be president? No it does not. It states:

'No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;....'

[Cold Case Posse Supporter]

Here is the link to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services website that the above information is no longer available.

http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-45077/0-0-0-48575.html

[Wurlitzer]

Because we all refused to believe democrats and now republicans would ever allow the implementation of the Communist Manifesto we paid for it to happen via our public schools and now we have enough communists or Progressives (one in the same) who control our information.

We lost everything the founders created.

There still people who claim to be conservative who still send their kids to government schools and somehow are expecting a middle of the road outcome.

There no longer any information reality! We surrendered the right to have our government be honest long ago.

A president can tell a nationwide audience about his red line and a year later claims he never said it and 1/2 the country just ignores it because he is the right color.

Because we accept lying this is the best we can expect from government. Until lying is a impeachable offense NOTHING WILL EVER CHANGE.

[humblegunner]

Move to chat, out of breaking news.

[Cold Case Posse Supporter]

Ping!

[faithhopecharity]

I actually had a note sent from a FR poster here....
just asserting that “there is no such thing as natural born citizen”

I used to enjoy watching 3 stooges cartoons, but REALLY! our educational system has hit a new bottom!

wow!

[Red Steel]

Here WaybackMachine.

http://web.archive.org/web/20100120153413/http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-45077/0-0-0-48575.html

[null and void]

Constitutional Eligibility

[DiogenesLamp]

Shhhhhhhhh! Don’t tell xzins!

[DiogenesLamp]

Move to chat, out of breaking news.

Reminds me of this.

[Texas Fossil]

They have scrubbed much more than that specific interpretation:

Go to the USCIS website and search for:

“Reacquisition of citizenship lost by marriage”

http://search.uscis.gov/search?affiliate=82601b2ec&query=Reacquisition+of+citizenship+lost+by+marriage&x=0&y=0

When you go to many of the links that returns they have the same statement that the page no longer exists.

They did a large general scrub job.

[MeganC]

I suggest that everyone who is interested in this issue should save a copy of this webpage to their computer because I’ve no doubt that the traces of this page will soon be scrubbed from the net.

[longtermmemmory]

tinfoil hat stuff. the usc has not changed and there has only ever been two forms of citizen.

[longtermmemmory]

try thomas.gov and look in usc.

[Cold Case Posse Supporter]

The website ‘Obama Release Your Records’ picked up my thread back on April 3, 2013 and published it.

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2013/04/ins-proves-obama-not-eligible.html

[truth_seeker]

People the world over are carefully watching the progress of Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse’s.

It is at the top of every news hour. It is the headline of every newspaper. It is the lead story of Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, and Sean Hannity.

or?

[Mr Rogers]

Your link NEVER proved anything. Regulations and websites cover more than one term without meaning that the terms have separate definitions.

And links die all the time. When a link dies to a horse training site, I don’t accuse the owners of trying to hide some valuable training technique!

[Cold Case Posse Supporter]

The link provides proof that native-born and natural-born are different subsets of citizen. They are not the same.

[Kenny Bunk]

We have known this from the beginning.

Native ≠ Natural

Since the beginning, Team Obama has attempted to obscure this rather simple concept with one smokescreen after another.

There is no way they could attempt to prove his constitutional eligibility, but to use the weak pretext of native birth. Hence the entire born-in-Hawaii BC nightmare.

Tell me SCOTUS, is one citizen parent enough to claim "natural born Citizen?" Is birth in the country alone enough to claim it? Tell me please exactly what "natural born Citizen" means.

[Mr Rogers]

No, it did not. Using “native-born or natural-born citizen” in a regulation does NOT mean the terms have separate definitions. It merely means both were in common use, as here:

“But the Secretary of State, according to the allegation of the bill of complaint, had refused to issue a passport to Miss Elg “solely on the ground that she had lost her native born American citizenship.” The court below, properly recognizing the existence of an actual controversy with the defendants (Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth, 300 U. S. 227), declared Miss Elg “to be a natural born citizen of the United States,” and we think that the decree should include the Secretary of State as well as the other defendants.”