Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/14/2013 8:57:09 AM PDT by liizo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: liizo

This technology already exists.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millimeter_wave_scanner


2 posted on 08/14/2013 8:58:35 AM PDT by MeganC (A gun is like a parachute. If you need one, and don't have one, you'll never need one again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: liizo

you need a warrant as far as I can determine


3 posted on 08/14/2013 8:59:26 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: liizo

I see a boom in new holsters and outerwear featuring RAM, (Radar Absorbent Material). Sometime I think we are witnessing a new arms race but on a more personal level than we’ve ever seen before. Sort of like ‘Cold War’ at the local level instead of between nations.


5 posted on 08/14/2013 9:03:44 AM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: liizo

I see a future for radar jamming equipment perhaps as small as a cell phone to be carried on the person or as large as one needs to screw with radar near the home. If people can randomly generate radar for invasive purposes, I claim the right to randomly screw with it.


6 posted on 08/14/2013 9:15:52 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: liizo

How difficult would it be to build a polarimetric radar detector and jammer?


7 posted on 08/14/2013 9:17:29 AM PDT by EdReform (Oath Keepers - Guardians of the Republic - Honor your oath - Join us: www.oathkeepers.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: liizo

Kamal Sarabandi?

Does the radar have a muslim exception?


12 posted on 08/14/2013 9:29:44 AM PDT by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: liizo

The current legal status would be linked very strongly to the expectation of privacy. When you are out in public, your expectation of privacy is reduced. According to SCOTUS, in it’s ruling on Terry vs Ohio held that the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person “may be armed and presently dangerous.

However, the very NATURE of a concealed weapon is the expectation of privacy. It would follow then, that as long as you are not committing, or can not be reasonably suspected as having committed a crime, that a warrant would be necessary to use this device. Further, if the device is used without warrant, without any other reasonable cause, the officer would have no grounds for detention.

But you never know how the courts are going to rule.

It would seem to me though that this technology might be most appropriate for a security checkpoint as it might be better than current detection equipment.


17 posted on 08/14/2013 9:54:55 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: liizo

I think that if the irradiate you without a warrant or your consent... that you can sue them.


19 posted on 08/14/2013 10:08:38 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: liizo; zot

I wonder if my stainless steel hip replacement looks like a gun or just an aging hippy?


20 posted on 08/14/2013 10:09:03 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson