Skip to comments.
New force potentially stronger than gravity discovered ( With cosmic Dust )
Vr-zone ^
| July 26, 2013 2:40 am
| David Farrell
Posted on 08/09/2013 12:21:13 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
The Blackbody force is a newly discovered force that attracts atoms and molecules to hot, opaque objects emitting blackbody radiation. Under certain circumstances, the new force is stronger than gravity.
(Excerpt) Read more at vr-zone.com ...
TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: blackbodyforce; cosmos; gravity; planets; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I know this one attracts a lot of my molecules!
2
posted on
08/09/2013 12:23:09 PM PDT
by
Mr. K
(Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics, and then Democrat Talking Points.)
To: SunkenCiv; BenLurkin; neverdem
They say it is important in collecting cosmic dust and assisting in formation of planets.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
isn’t gravity considered a relatively weak force in scientific terms?
4
posted on
08/09/2013 12:26:33 PM PDT
by
GeronL
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
My blackiron frying pan is at times hot, opaque and a blackbody. Will it fly?
5
posted on
08/09/2013 12:27:23 PM PDT
by
Hardraade
(http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Obama: the bearded lady of Muslim Brotherhood))
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
And it's not even April 1!
I guess a society fixated on zombies is going to believe all sorts of other cr#p, like Rossi's cold fusion and maybe this, too.
6
posted on
08/09/2013 12:28:43 PM PDT
by
expat2
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
7
posted on
08/09/2013 12:29:14 PM PDT
by
JoeProBono
(Mille vocibus imago valet;-{)
To: GeronL
The weakest of the four by far.
Strong Nuclear force
Electromagnetic force
Weak Nuclear force
Gravity
8
posted on
08/09/2013 12:29:29 PM PDT
by
EEGator
To: GeronL
isnt gravity considered a relatively weak force in scientific terms?
Yes, of the four forces, Strong, Weak, and Electromagnetism being the other three, Gravity is the weakest. But it can be felt over the farthest distance, i.e. the entire universe.
9
posted on
08/09/2013 12:30:18 PM PDT
by
MAexile
(Bats left, votes right)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
“opaque objects emitting blackbody radiation.”
That’s racist!
10
posted on
08/09/2013 12:32:51 PM PDT
by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: MAexile; EEGator
bump
I knew I had heard that somewhere before.
Blame the Science Channel. :p
11
posted on
08/09/2013 12:33:48 PM PDT
by
GeronL
To: Mr. K
Well...I wouldn't call her opaque. Obtuse prhaps. But not opaque.
But she is definitely a hot object.
12
posted on
08/09/2013 12:34:43 PM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(So Obama "inherited" a mess? Firemen "inherit" messes too. Ever see one put gasoline on it?)
To: Mastador1
“Opaque-American” might be considered racist
13
posted on
08/09/2013 12:34:56 PM PDT
by
GeronL
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
They say it is important in collecting cosmic dust and assisting in formation of planets. Thus the reason they felt they needed to invent it. Just like 'dark' matter.
14
posted on
08/09/2013 12:35:42 PM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(So Obama "inherited" a mess? Firemen "inherit" messes too. Ever see one put gasoline on it?)
To: Hardraade
My blackiron frying pan is at times hot, opaque and a blackbody. Will it fly? No, but you have gigatons of cosmic duct converging on your frying pan at this moment.
Pick a name your your new planet - you have about 3 weeks until planetary accretion begins.
15
posted on
08/09/2013 12:42:25 PM PDT
by
BwanaNdege
("To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"- Voltaire)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Her name would be pronounced: o-PAH-kway
16
posted on
08/09/2013 12:53:14 PM PDT
by
mikrofon
(Jeantel Rachelist)
To: GeronL
Gravity is the weakest of the four forces but it acts over a much greater range.
17
posted on
08/09/2013 1:10:59 PM PDT
by
Squawk 8888
(I'd give up chocolate but I'm no quitter)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
curious
does this change anything about, or understood from, standard assumptions in physics?
18
posted on
08/09/2013 1:16:31 PM PDT
by
Wuli
(uir)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
19
posted on
08/09/2013 1:19:43 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(The monsters are due on Maple Street)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
One of the odder things about this is that its decay does not follow the inverse square law. If that is true, then it is unique and may not obey other rules of space-time.
20
posted on
08/09/2013 2:32:09 PM PDT
by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
(Be Brave! Fear is just the opposite of Nar!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson