Posted on 07/19/2013 7:03:40 AM PDT by Rusty0604
You know those opponents of marriage equality who said government approval of same-sex marriage might erode bans on polygamous and incestuous marriages? asks the professor, Kent Greenfield. Theyre right.
The left is in this bind in part because our arguments for expanding the marriage right to same-sex couples have been so compelling, Greenfield brags proudly. Marriage, weve said, is about defining ones own family and consecrating a union based on love. Weve voiced these arguments in constitutional terms, using claims arising from the doctrines of fundamental rights and equal protection.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Duh.
Of course we are right. Once you open the floodgates, you can’t control what comes through them.
That’s the whole point, isn’t it?
The complete societal breakdown through the rejection of Judeo-Christian norms?
It was never about 2 homos getting hitched. It was always about moving the borders of what is immoral and the end-result. We on the right knew this. The leftards pretend they don’t know.
Love the pic with the article. Perfect.
Oh, but they denied it right up until they got their way.
So predictable.
Horse hockey. There's only one definition of marriage that matters. And it ain't Kent Greenfield's.
Once that first sexual perversion of homosexuality is accepted then ALL sexual perversions are fair game to be accepted.
Those who know God know the end of the immoral road our elites have chosen for us is to become a pillar of salt and for our souls to burn in hell.
The destruction of our society is the goal.
I’m old enough to remember when it was being argued that the pill wouldn’t lead to an increase is promiscuity. Once a dam wall has been breached, there is no turning back the water. Anytime you hear progressives say ‘we only want to go this far’ realize that there is an unstated ‘for now’. They will constantly push the limits until they reach total depravity.
That’s right. In learning about how to prevent employee theft, I was taught to stop it right when someone takes a pencil home, because theft usually starts out small but increases if gone unpunished.
Dn't need n Weatherman t see which waybama's wind
blws.
"Behind the Violence, Says Jane Alpert, Was Sex"--November 09, 1981--
"The leaders of the Weather Underground, she believes, followed a similar pattern of constantly shifting sexual alliances..."http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20080637,00.html
"He [Bill Ayers] also writes about the Weathermen's sexual experimentation as they tried to 'smash monogamy.' The Weathermen were 'an army of lovers,' he says, and describes having had different sexual partners, including his best male friend."
Source: New York Times, September 11, 2001: "No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives; In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life With the Weathermen"
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F02E1DE1438F932A2575AC0A9679C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=1"...the Weathermen, when not engaged in group sex, committed such revolutionary acts as parading with a Viet Cong flag through a local park on Independence Day and spray-painting the walls of a high school with the slogans, "Off the Pigs," "Viet Cong Will Win," and "F#$k U.S. Imperialism."..."
Campus Wars: The Peace Movement At American State Universities in the Vietnam Era
"What happens next bears watching closely, as does the response of the president, ex-Speaker Pelosi, and others on the left. Encouraged by leftists in the Democratic Party and funded by left-leaning nonprofit organizations and celebrity contributors, Occupy Wall Street may in time morph into something resembling the radical factions of the late 1960s and 1970s."
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/10/predicting_the_weatherman.html
Paddle faster, I hear banjos!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.