yup.
let’s not have drunk drivers be responsible for their actions, they’re drunk too, often too drunk to know what they’re doing. idiot logic.
women are not children. they drink and drink and they are not responsible?please.
Faulty logic. The drunk driver is engaging in an action while drunk that is often times fatal.
A drunk woman has no capacity to give consent to intercourse. What boorish man would want to have sex with a woman so intoxicated that she can’t stand and may very well be passed out....hence non responsive. for all the ment who find that attractive I say shame on you. Your parents should have taught you better....and if they did you should have paid more attention. If a man thinks that all that is important is getting his then he is a lower than an animal rooting around the barnyard.
I've been saying this for years. A man who drives drunk is guilty, even if (especially if) he's too drunk to realize he's driving drunk. Meanwhile, if two drunk people have sex, then the woman is presumed to be unable to give consent, but the equally drunk man is presumed to have the judgement to realize that she's not qualified to give consent. BS.
The only exception I would make is if the woman is physically unconscious and completely unaware of what's happening.
In the event of the couple being married, I would presume the marriage vows constitute consent in the absence of explicit withdrawal of consent.