Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Secret Agent Man
let’s not have drunk drivers be responsible for their actions, they’re drunk too, often too drunk to know what they’re doing. idiot logic. women are not children. they drink and drink and they are not responsible?please.

I've been saying this for years. A man who drives drunk is guilty, even if (especially if) he's too drunk to realize he's driving drunk. Meanwhile, if two drunk people have sex, then the woman is presumed to be unable to give consent, but the equally drunk man is presumed to have the judgement to realize that she's not qualified to give consent. BS.

The only exception I would make is if the woman is physically unconscious and completely unaware of what's happening.

In the event of the couple being married, I would presume the marriage vows constitute consent in the absence of explicit withdrawal of consent.

56 posted on 07/13/2013 9:47:04 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

Well, the women in question believe that if the man were not consenting “Their bodies have a way to shut that thing down.”


58 posted on 07/13/2013 9:57:12 AM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson