Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

..it seems the F.B.I. has some interesting rules pertaining to their interviews...worth watching......
1 posted on 06/20/2013 2:31:25 PM PDT by virgil283
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


.


2 posted on 06/20/2013 2:33:31 PM PDT by loungitude (The truth hurts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283

My husband has interesting policies for interviewing FBI agents.


3 posted on 06/20/2013 2:36:31 PM PDT by MeganC (A gun is like a parachute. If you need one, and don't have one, you'll never need one again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283

Um, I’ll make it easier. Never talk to law enforcement. “I understand you’re doing your job, and I am willing to fully cooperate. It would be irresponsible of me to do so before speaking to my attorney.”


4 posted on 06/20/2013 2:36:45 PM PDT by andyk (I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283

7 minutes video? how about short summary sentence to post here?


5 posted on 06/20/2013 2:41:13 PM PDT by MNDude (Sorry for typos. Probably written on a smartphone, and I have big clumsy fingers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283

It would seem to me that one could have a standard video recording sign on the front of the building notifying that all occupants are under video and audio surveillance. Then have a camera and audio recording of the meeting without having to produce the tape recording machine. That way you would have the meeting, record it accurately and then you can dispute what ever form was produced by the agent.

I suspect that there is some local or federal law that would prohibit that particular action. Any legal eagles want to comment?


7 posted on 06/20/2013 2:44:53 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283

18 USC 1001: it is a FELONY to not tell the truth to a government employee. But there is no symmetrical requirement that they not lie to you or penalty if they do.


8 posted on 06/20/2013 2:47:59 PM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283

Another thing about “lying to a federal employee”. If you tell them something you believe to be true which turns out later to be untrue, they can charge you.

If you present the FBI agent with the public servant questionnaire, they MUST fill it out in its entirety.

http://nonais.org/techdocs/PublicServantQuestionnaire.pdf


9 posted on 06/20/2013 2:48:09 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283

bfl


16 posted on 06/20/2013 3:12:26 PM PDT by Dr. Thorne ("How long, O Lord, holy and true?" - Rev. 6:10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283

Home viewing bookmark and form to print out.


23 posted on 06/20/2013 3:41:07 PM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: virgil283

M4L


29 posted on 01/18/2014 7:19:41 PM PST by Scrambler Bob ( Concerning bo -- that refers to the president. If I capitalize it, I mean the dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson