a pissed off unarmed patriot or an arrogant armed liberal ?
Of course MY answer is the pissed off patriot.
What if the bear and the shark were each riding on the backs of eagles?
Does the author know that bears can swim underwater?
This is why you play for homefield advantage. Clearly, the home team would win this fight.....no way around it.
What if the shark had a frickin’ laser on top of its’ head?
What if the bear’s gun was taken away and the shark had a laser on his head?
I don’t know but I will bet a Jet can beat a Shark.
There are sharks and bears of various sizes, which seems reasonably relevant.
Why bother debating something that could be so easily answered? It isn’t like there’s a shortage of sharks or bears.
European or African? Laden or unladen?
The thing is, the bear has paws to hold chainsaws, and the shark has only its mouth. At 200 feet deep in the ocean, I’ll go with the shark, in a cave in the Rockies at 6000 feet, I’d lean toward the bear. The only fair thing to do is to find a neutral environment - toss them out of a helicopter with parachutes on and see which one wins by the time they hit the ground.
No contest.
As someone who has tangled with both, I’d fight a bear over a shark any day! Both would overpower a human in most fights but sharks have serious homefield advantage.
The majority of Americans have never contemplated such a match, let alone decided on a theoretical victor.
The bear will retreat, upon serious injury, if it’s cubs are not in danger. A shark will never stop trying to eat, as long as it is capable. If you gut a shark in the water, it’s instincts will compel it to devour it’s own entrails. My money’s on the shark.
I don’t know about a shark, but these days, I would bet on a bear versus a bull.
Who has home field?
I’d bet depending on who has the home field advantage.
Why can’t they just be friends?