Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: nickcarraway
how about, who'll win;
a pissed off unarmed patriot or an arrogant armed liberal ?
Of course MY answer is the pissed off patriot.
2 posted on
06/17/2013 4:06:03 PM PDT by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof, but they're true.)
To: nickcarraway
3 posted on
06/17/2013 4:06:11 PM PDT by
Joe 6-pack
(Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
To: nickcarraway
What if the bear and the shark were each riding on the backs of eagles?
4 posted on
06/17/2013 4:06:40 PM PDT by
oblomov
To: nickcarraway
Does the author know that bears can swim underwater?
5 posted on
06/17/2013 4:07:27 PM PDT by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
To: nickcarraway
This is why you play for homefield advantage. Clearly, the home team would win this fight.....no way around it.
6 posted on
06/17/2013 4:07:50 PM PDT by
C. Edmund Wright
(Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
To: nickcarraway
What if the shark had a frickin’ laser on top of its’ head?
7 posted on
06/17/2013 4:08:22 PM PDT by
dfwgator
To: nickcarraway
What if the bear’s gun was taken away and the shark had a laser on his head?
8 posted on
06/17/2013 4:08:56 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
To: nickcarraway
I don’t know but I will bet a Jet can beat a Shark.
11 posted on
06/17/2013 4:10:07 PM PDT by
Cyman
To: nickcarraway
There are sharks and bears of various sizes, which seems reasonably relevant.
To: nickcarraway
Why bother debating something that could be so easily answered? It isn’t like there’s a shortage of sharks or bears.
15 posted on
06/17/2013 4:12:14 PM PDT by
MNDude
(Sorry for typos. Probably written on a smartphone, and I have big clumsy fingers.)
To: nickcarraway
European or African? Laden or unladen?
16 posted on
06/17/2013 4:12:54 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
To: nickcarraway
The thing is, the bear has paws to hold chainsaws, and the shark has only its mouth. At 200 feet deep in the ocean, I’ll go with the shark, in a cave in the Rockies at 6000 feet, I’d lean toward the bear. The only fair thing to do is to find a neutral environment - toss them out of a helicopter with parachutes on and see which one wins by the time they hit the ground.
To: nickcarraway
No contest.
To: nickcarraway
As someone who has tangled with both, I’d fight a bear over a shark any day! Both would overpower a human in most fights but sharks have serious homefield advantage.
21 posted on
06/17/2013 4:15:49 PM PDT by
CodeToad
(Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
To: nickcarraway
The majority of Americans have never contemplated such a match, let alone decided on a theoretical victor.
To: nickcarraway
The bear will retreat, upon serious injury, if it’s cubs are not in danger. A shark will never stop trying to eat, as long as it is capable. If you gut a shark in the water, it’s instincts will compel it to devour it’s own entrails. My money’s on the shark.
To: nickcarraway
I don’t know about a shark, but these days, I would bet on a bear versus a bull.
To: nickcarraway
28 posted on
06/17/2013 4:21:42 PM PDT by
OKSooner
To: nickcarraway
I’d bet depending on who has the home field advantage.
29 posted on
06/17/2013 4:21:55 PM PDT by
Amagi
(Buying "Green"means inferior quality and increased cost.)
To: nickcarraway
Why can’t they just be friends?
31 posted on
06/17/2013 4:26:27 PM PDT by
3Fingas
(Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
