Posted on 05/12/2013 10:50:03 AM PDT by EveningStar
If you haven't already, you're going to hear a whole bunch of gripes about "The Great Gatsby" movie out this weekend. And the biggest of them all will likely have something to do with how faithful it was to the classic F. Scott Fitzgerald novel.
Needless to say, there are some significant changes. But there are significant changes in "Iron Man" when put up against the comic books -- sometimes change is necessary, and even good. Then again, sometimes they're not.
(Excerpt) Read more at movies.yahoo.com ...
While there are some small but significant liberties taken, IMHO, they actually serve to better relate the larger themes and emphasize the more obvious symbols and back story.
As mentioned above, the device of Carraway writing from an institution sounds very contrived in speaking or writing about it, yet on screen - it worked. Similarly, the flashbacks to Gatsby's childhood, Dan Cody and his days as a junior officer were brief but very effectively contributed to the overall telling of the story.
I noticed that its getting mixed reviews.
Didn't care for the book, and have not liked a single movie I have seen DiCaprio in.
Absolutely hated Titanic and walked out halfway through the movie (can't recall the name) that he was "gay" in.
In addition he is an uberliberal.
Three strikes in my book.
Makes sense to me. And FWIW (without having seen it yet) DiCaprio strikes me as the best possible choice to play Gatsby from the current crop of actorsmaybe because of, rather than in spite of, all the reasons he is hated on FR. (I would have liked to see Allison Pill as Daisy after she did such a believable job as Zelda in Woody Allen's Midnight in Paris.)
I agree. DiCaprio was an excellent casting choice for JG.
Then you missed the best part, the part where he dies in the end.
While the majority of the leads were libs, “Midnight in Paris” was amazing. Loved Picasso and Latrec.
The only reason I saw that either of them was that I owed the wife a chick flick. She didn't tlike the "gay" one either.
In the movie, I heard the word "kike" used to refer to Jews, something I didn't see in the book.
The musical score was ridiculous. There was no rap or disco in 1922. And the few tunes from the 1920’s that were used were all post-1922.
Did you see the movie?
I thought that Hemingway in Midnight In Paris was spot on.Sexiest Hemingway ever!
I just saw the movie this afternoon. In its favor, the 3-D technology certainly added to its entertainment value, and although it was more than two hours long, it was never boring.
I thought the flashbacks to Gatsby’s childhood were an improvement on the book. And in the book, when Carraway asks Gatsby what part of the Midwest he is from, Gatsby answers “San Francisco.” The movie omitted this ridiculous answer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.