Posted on 05/01/2013 8:11:44 AM PDT by EXCH54FE
The Alabama Democrat Party just submitted a completely different birth certificate than the one that was posted at the White House website in 2011.
Larry Klayman, the plaintiff’s counsel submitted the forgery of Barack Hussein Obama’s birth certificate that was posted to whitehouse.gov on 4-27-2001 (seen below). Fogbow/Jack Ryan obot group produced another bogus one. Still a third birth certificate has been submitted by Alabama Democrats to the Supreme Court.
Remember, this court is being presided over by Chief Justice Roy Moore, who supported Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, when he believed Obama to be a usurper and denied following orders to deploy to Iraq until Obama proved his eligibility as part of keeping his oath (ironically Lakin was not supported by Mr. Oathkeeper Stewart Rhodes). Another justice on the court by the name of Tom Parker will also hear the case. He has stated in a previous case:
“McInnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the “short form” and the “long form” birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.”
While the Alabama Democrats attacked the merits of the appeal, calling the evidence by McInnish “inadmissible and not worthy of belief,” they also stated “A county sheriff from Arizona is not an ‘official source’ of anything in Alabama.”
But what stands out in their brief is something very new, Barack Hussein Obama’s long form birth certificate that has a different backing, something never before seen. It’s on page 33 in the document below.
(Excerpt) Read more at freedomoutpost.com ...
So do we repeal them in order to find out what's in them too!
What is the graphic which only appears as a grayish square?
I am unable to enlarge it, to view it.
Simply put two birth certificates that are different, one is fake.
I thinks its funny that some people buy the race of the father as “African”, it should have been “Negro”.
Bread and circuses. A bunch of distraction created to cloud the real issue.
Fact: All the people in Congress KNOW the truth. The CIA has files on everyone who runs for office.
Thus every person in Congress is complicit. Legally.
That is a problem.
So they do the show you see, drag it out with side issues that can be fought and claim it’s ‘settled science and old news” when anyone brings up the real issue...because most people don’t KNOW the real issue. Thus anyone with a clue is mocked and made to look like a ‘Truther”.
“It’s funny, because if they ever find that Obama was not eligible to hold the office of the Presidency, there will be an extreme Constitutional crisis requiring the review of all laws he signed.”
I hear you but given the current environment who would force such a constitutional crisis besides maybe a handful of House members? Unfortunately the bread and circuses would continue. Nothing would happen.
Having said that we should never give up and we should document the truth - whatever it is - and get it in the public record. Maybe someone someday may give a rip and be able to use it.
This kind of lost me when I saw the name Larry Klayman.
Klayman burned up about $100 million on lawsuits that NEVER went anywhere when he was at Judicial Watch. If he is involved this is going nowhere. Oh, he will collect a lot of money from people to chase this kind of stuff down. But it will never go anywhere. Just Larry doing fundraising.....
The longer we wait, the more it’ll hurt. With Kagan and Sotomayor on the bench illegally, there are potentially hundreds of cases on which they could the deciding vote that would have to be reassessed. Americans are tough, we’ll get through.
I do agree with you, however. No one has the spine to push this issue.
Yes good point. If a crime was committed than criminal prosecution of specific crimes may be more effective. Same approach used to bring down the mob.
Stripes and pink underwear. It would be my pleasure!
Patriots should never give up on this fight. Regardless if the fraud serves his whole four years, it’s the most stark example of how our ruling class is corrupt beyond redemption. They must be brought down.
isthisnickcool wrote:
This kind of lost me when I saw the name Larry Klayman.
Klayman burned up about $100 million on lawsuits that NEVER went anywhere when he was at Judicial Watch. If he is involved this is going nowhere. Oh,he will collect a lot of money from people to chase this kind of stuff down. But it will never go anywhere. Just Larry doing fundraising.....”
This concerned me also, but this time we have judge Moore.
So there may be a chance that klayman gets this one.
(FRmail incoming)
This one alone would be worth it.
“This kind of lost me when I saw the name Larry Klayman”
We see the football, we know it exists, we go after the football and just before we get to kick this SOB out of OUR house, some black robed communist mole pulls the football away.
“So do we repeal them in order to find out what’s in them too!”
That there is funny.
I’ll see you and raise you one.
At this point what does it matter?
There would be all the EOs
didn’t Pelosi certify this birth ce4rtificate? What about arresting her too?
“With Kagan and Sotomayor on the bench illegally, there are potentially hundreds of cases on which they could the deciding vote that would have to be reassessed.”
Judges appointed by a usurper must be objected to in pre-trial phase. After the verdict or ruling, the De Facto Officer Doctrine kicks in to protect the Federal government from chaos and disruption.
Legislation signed into law by a usurper can be objected to individually if specific adverse action is applied to the individual. For example, the IRS assesses an individual taxpayer a tax for not obtaining and maintaining a healthcare insurance policy. The individual can object to the tax assessment on the basis the law was signed by a usurper and does not apply to them because they object to laws signed by the usurper. The law remains ineffect for everyone else, but the IRS cannot tax the individual who formally objects after an assessment.
Oh, I think he was groomed FAR longer than 6 years...
Go to guidestar.org and sign up. Read the Judicial Watch IRS filings for a few years and you will figure out what the deal is with them.
The amazing thing is that they have always been a “NONPROFIT” which to me is a joke. I expect that Klayman’s latest outfit, Freedom Watch, is no different than JW. Lots of noise, lots of fundraising, lots of nothing...
“””“This kind of lost me when I saw the name Larry Klayman”
Yeah, Judicial Watch and Klayman are like Charlie Brown, Lucy and the football.
We see the football, we know it exists, we go after the football and just before we get to kick this SOB out of OUR house, some black robed communist mole pulls the football away.””””
Yup, times a million.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.