Posted on 04/20/2013 10:20:29 PM PDT by babygene
Glen Beck promised to release information Monday if the administration didn't come clean about the Boston bombing.
“Stand your ground.”
Thanks, And my only real “ground” was that we should cut Beck some slack.
Funny that you dance like Madona but can’t address where exactly my reasoning failed. Says a lot about you.
So don’t wrestle with my porcine self. You can’t win on false premises anyway.
OinK!
You’re kidding right??
Hannity = interesting interviews??
Bwwhahahah, good one!
Hannity is rapid and his guests ‘might’ be interesting to some, BUT, he can’t keep his mouth shut long enough for anyone to hear what the guest has to say!
Gotta say, you post some very odd stuff, this one just begged for a response.
“Funny that you dance like Madona but can’t address where exactly my reasoning failed.”
You know... I don’t want to get into the middle of this, I need to go to bed, but WHAT REASONING for God’s sake.
Hey Norm, did you ever catch any of the stuff Breitbart’s ‘find’ did? The ACORN sting? That kid, and Andrew, knew how to play the game.
It’s called setting a trap, this is not rocket science.
Ratings? C’mon, the man sunk his own money into his on-line show, of course he needs funds to keep it going. But it seems you guys are missing the forest for the trees.
Norm wants you to believe his assumptions (that GB is waiting until Monday purely out of self interest, to the detriment of the nation) are deductive reasoning. He wants someone, anyone, to wrestle with his foolishness so he can pump up his failing ego. Just leave him to his muck.
Reread my posts. For God’s sake. You do not see a problem with making end of the world existential proclamations that could end the country unless we do X and saying “Oh just tune in next freaking week and I’ll tell you what they are?
Really? Are you that willing to defend Beck that you will humiliate yourself denying the most simple flaw in his great plan?
So be it.
And you still can’t answer with anything but an attempt at mockery. Good night Woogums. Sleep well.
Would you rather have 2 million viewers know, and understand, or 20 million viewers know and understand. At 2 million, no matter how involved Obama’s administration was involved in covering up those involved in Boston, even if Obama himself laid down those bombs, nothing would be done. At 20 million, it becomes much harder to cover it up.
For those 20 million to know, Beck has to create a buildup of anticipation, which does involve a little bit of showmanship.
But I guess it depends on what is more important to you, Beck releasing the info in a way that makes it easier or more difficult to cover up.
Set a trap. Right. The country will end but Glen will set a trap in full public view after Brietbart made it a common practice. I’m sure that since it’s happened to them a few times the left will never see it coming.
Of course, he could have just exposed his truths and made them scramble, thus catching themselves up in a lot of CYA lies.... But that does not get ratings.
Truth is important to me. Not showmanship at the expense of the country. My priorities are different I guess.
Me too, bud. Just a little slack. It is amazing how little there is, at times. Perhaps, only a mustard seed. Never give up!
Good, now what’s your secondary priority, that two million people know or twenty million people know?
Did you hear the 20 minutes on Friday’s radio show?
Or, see the video from Friday’s TV show?
Or, read the transcript of it?
You honestly don’t know the premise of what was said and what he was doing.
Once you’ve looked into it, come back and keep up the beating of a voice that is trying to get the non-freepers of the country to learn something.
If by some chance you’ve listened/watched/read it, then I have to say, it seems like there is a personal distaste on your part that has nothing to do with the subject at hand.
Thank you babygene, I agree. This constant ripping of some valuable voices on our side is exhausting.
Beck got rid of Van Jones.
What did you do?
Bottom line. Find the flaw in the following logic...
If this info was so earth shattering and existential to America, Does holding it help or hinder the cause? Does giving the left a few days to CYA help or hinder the cause?
I say it hurts. A lot. If you say otherwise, try convincing someone unable to follow logical progressions. Because logic dictates that when the intent is to expose, hiding things is counterproductive to stated intent. As is playing games for ratings.
If he has the goods, he does a disservice to every American by playing wait and see games.
Good night all.
I don’t think Barry can come clean. I think the Saudi’s played a major trump card here. Possibly something to do with Obama’s college records, etc. The threat was unmistakable. “Let our kid go or we dump our stuff online.”
So, he’s stuck. He doesn’t know what Beck has, but he has to assume the worst.
Cost a green Group 6 figures in funding and broke up a deal with the greens / Lycosthat got me a hit piece in Time Magazine once. Earth day issue 98.
We all do what we can.
http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0998lycos.htm
Jones I am sure is a certified nutter. Beck may be also.
But it doesn't mean they are always wrong.
So to mis-quote Ronaldus Maximus: "Listen but verify!"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.