Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ClearCase_guy
The fact that, in the end, everyone does die, does not in any way provide “evidence against God”.

Exactly. There is nothing you would accept as "evidence against God," which is what I mean when I say that no new information is ever incorporated. The standing belief that everything is God's will means nothing is ever new. That's why religion and science have two different names. The latter must account for new information. For the former, there is no such thing.

20 posted on 04/14/2013 11:43:05 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: A_perfect_lady
I'm not sure I agree with how you are phrasing that, but the core statement seems clear enough, and is one I will not take issue with. Science wants to discuss one thing, and religion is largely focused on something different.
22 posted on 04/14/2013 11:54:46 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The ballot box is a sham. Nothing will change until after the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson