Here they go again. Maybe its time for a referendum protecting the freedom of non profits.
1 posted on
04/09/2013 12:55:22 PM PDT by
Maelstorm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: Maelstorm
This is just the first step toward stripping religious organizations of their non-profit status.
2 posted on
04/09/2013 12:56:58 PM PDT by
Maelstorm
(This country wasn't founded with the battle cry "Give me liberty or give me a govt check!")
To: Maelstorm
Maybe its time for a referendum protecting the freedom of non profits. Easier yet, just vote the communists out of office.
3 posted on
04/09/2013 12:57:54 PM PDT by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: Maelstorm
If they strip the Boy Scouts of their tax exempt status, then Planned Parenthood should be fair game.
4 posted on
04/09/2013 12:57:59 PM PDT by
Slyfox
(The Key to Marxism is Medicine ~ Vladimir Lenin)
To: Maelstorm
Simple Solution. They Boy Scouts need to leave gay Cali-fornicate.
6 posted on
04/09/2013 12:59:24 PM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: Maelstorm
You’re exactly right. That should be next on the agenda in red states.
7 posted on
04/09/2013 1:00:00 PM PDT by
Viennacon
To: Maelstorm
If they force the gay men on the Boy Scouts as Pack Leaders, there’s going to be stripping, anyway...
Predators. The fox is in the henhouse!
9 posted on
04/09/2013 1:00:31 PM PDT by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
To: Maelstorm
The pedophile party is working to get access to the boys.
10 posted on
04/09/2013 1:01:00 PM PDT by
NoLibZone
(A nation's electoral process is as free and fair as its press.)
To: Maelstorm
OK, Lets shut down all the non-Christian religious organizations and summer camps.
I really hope CA legislators are not that stupid.
11 posted on
04/09/2013 1:02:23 PM PDT by
Robert357
(D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
To: Maelstorm
I imagine the gay peoples republic of California has been poised to strip Boy Scouts for a long time
12 posted on
04/09/2013 1:02:31 PM PDT by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: Maelstorm
Get rid of all tax exempt everything. Get rid of Eic while you are at it.
13 posted on
04/09/2013 1:03:13 PM PDT by
napscoordinator
(Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the Country!)
To: Maelstorm
I’m sure there are many in California who would like to strip the Boy Scouts of more than just tax exemption.
15 posted on
04/09/2013 1:05:33 PM PDT by
Huskrrrr
To: Maelstorm
Take the whole thing off-radar. Go back to meeting in garages. Give up the corporate aspects.
To: Maelstorm
Sure, attack an organization that teaches wonderful values to young boys and teaches them hard work, service to others and dedication. The state of Moronfornia isn’t about any of those things. So kill off the Boy Scouts in California so we get more juvenille deliquency and street gangs, all because the sacred protected class of deviants gets their feelings hurt if someone doesn’t accept their perverted lifestyles. “Accept me! Accept me!” << The credo of the Stalinist gay movement.
21 posted on
04/09/2013 1:09:56 PM PDT by
MissesBush
(The Fourth Estate has Become a Fifth Column)
To: Maelstorm
Scout leadership is voluntary and not a paid position, so I cannot see how Government
can impose any regulations on a non-profit for choosing who they want in the club.
But then, we're talking about a state full of IDIOTS who vote these asshats into office.
23 posted on
04/09/2013 1:12:36 PM PDT by
MaxMax
To: Maelstorm
“free exercise”
“freedom of association”
“establishment of a state religion”
This is the same state where they want mandatory fertility insurance coverate if two man having intercorse with each other does not produce a pregnancy. (but they have to try for one year. How will that be proven?)
25 posted on
04/09/2013 1:14:07 PM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Maelstorm
This provision would be an unconstitution infringment on freedom of association and would violate the equal protection clause by discriminating on the basis of religion. It would be a blatently unconstitutional law and California knows this yet they are trying to bully the scouts with the high costs of litigating the issue to victory.
To: Maelstorm
The homosexual crowd have depended on freedom of association to assert their privilege of consenting sex with whoever in private.
Now they don't like the freedom of association?
Time to act ~ prohibit homosexual association in other states ~ punish it with a special tax.
Two can play at this game.
27 posted on
04/09/2013 1:15:53 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: Maelstorm
The fags really, REALLY want to have unimpeded access to young boys. Good God, they make me sick...
31 posted on
04/09/2013 1:18:08 PM PDT by
ScottinVA
(Gun control: Steady firm grip, target within sights, squeeze the trigger slowly...)
To: Maelstorm
This is exactly why I am against “Gay Marriage”.
32 posted on
04/09/2013 1:30:21 PM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
To: Maelstorm
Wow. Haven’t they ever heard of the Freedom of Association?
What a mad house California has become and all for the support of what we were once convinced was “private behavior between consenting adults”.
33 posted on
04/09/2013 1:30:52 PM PDT by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson