Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

End of an Era? Sears Portrait Studio Closes
Newser ^ | 04/05/2013 | By John Johnson

Posted on 04/05/2013 8:51:33 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd

The digital age might have another victim: Sears has shut down its portrait studio, at least for now, after the photography company that has been snapping family portraits for the chain since 1959 abruptly closed up shop, reports the Wall Street Journal. CPI Corp. also ran studios at Walmart and Babies "R" Us, and all three retailers are scrambling to figure out next steps. Sears is "exploring all options" to resume portrait services, says the company.

It was just a matter of time, writes Chris Gampat at the Phoblographer blog. People are taking their own photos with their own digital cameras, and they care less about prints. "This trend started in the wedding industry and it was only a matter of time until it hit retailers." Adds Stan Horaczek at PopPhoto: "The world doesn't necessarily need any more photos of awkward families plunked in front of fireplaces. But, it does say something about how willing people are to pay for photography in general."


TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: portrait; sears
Something else that's gone with the dinosaurs? The photo department at most stores. Someone gave my daughter an old 35mm camera. It was a Nikon. Very expensive some 15 years ago. But now? As useful as a typewriter.
1 posted on 04/05/2013 8:51:33 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Does this mean I have to get rid of my powder blue polyester suit with the wide lapels and my white platform shoes?

/johnny

2 posted on 04/05/2013 8:54:40 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Perhaps they need to examine other sources of loss that are taking up space. It’s probably one of the more pro-active steps they’ve taken in awhile.

Whether we like it or not stuff changes. If it ain’t helping your business, change it so it does, or drop it.

It wouldn’t hurt them to remodel their stores, which most strike you as Brady Bunch era 1970s exteriors and interiors.


3 posted on 04/05/2013 9:00:17 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Yes. And get rid of the mullet while you're at it.

 

4 posted on 04/05/2013 9:00:39 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
You are a buzzkill.

Actually, I've got a real hippy going gray ponytail. I blend in with the birkenstock crowd well, until I open my mouth. Considering Barry Goldwater a liberal doesn't make the real hippies happy. ;)

/johnny

5 posted on 04/05/2013 9:04:00 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

So mama don’t take my Kodachrome away.


6 posted on 04/05/2013 9:04:37 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

And don't forget the family pictures.

7 posted on 04/05/2013 9:05:20 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

SEARS photos were very good. The color lasts and lasts. Some we had taken about 38 years ago are still as beautiful as the day they were developed.

Walmart photos are crap. Photos we had made there began to fade and within five years turned to a reddish color. The blues and yellows disappeared.


8 posted on 04/05/2013 10:12:53 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (The murals in OKC are destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Yes.
Please.


9 posted on 04/05/2013 10:32:24 PM PDT by Salamander (Like acid and oil on a madman's face, reason tends to fly away.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

It’s a part of my bucket list....before I exit this mortal coil...I NEED to learn if mullet child is a male or female. And is this family well or have they succumbed to an AquaNet inversion in their abode?


10 posted on 04/05/2013 10:40:28 PM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom ( Mourning in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

LOL! That little girl is so cute!


11 posted on 04/05/2013 11:43:02 PM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Yeah I got some very expensive 35MM lenses but luckily you can still use them with some of these new digital Cameras especially when filming movies. Of course they won’t work with the auto-lense functions the newer lenses have but at least they aren’t worthless.


12 posted on 04/05/2013 11:46:16 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
SEARS photos were very good. The color lasts and lasts. Some we had taken about 38 years ago are still as beautiful as the day they were developed.

What matters is exactly what the color was at each point in the photo. That's just a heap of numbers. Just data. If you can save the numbers, you don't have to worry about whether the color lasts. Because you can reproduce it on demand. Now or ten thousand years from now.

So, if you've got some old Sears photos you want to keep, your best bet is to scan them in at high resolution and preserve the digital images. And remember to spread around copies, because digital images are not indestructible (but terabyte drives are cheap).

13 posted on 04/06/2013 12:07:56 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Does this mean I have to get rid of my powder blue polyester suit with the wide lapels and my white platform shoes?


I had one of those around 1977. Johnny Carson brand, I think. LOL


14 posted on 04/06/2013 12:10:54 AM PDT by laplata (The Answer To 1984 Is 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

These photo studios provided a low cost service to families with small children to get their first professional photograph. Nothing wrong with the concept, except the operators couldn’t raise prices sufficient to maintain the business over the years.

A sad passing of another wonderful part of American life.


15 posted on 04/06/2013 6:47:04 AM PDT by mohresearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

I miss mulletsgalore.com; that site was hilarious.

Back to this article, I hear the stock of awkwardfamilyphotos.com dropped 30% on the news here. If you’ve never seen it, it’s a gem.

http://awkwardfamilyphotos.com/


16 posted on 04/06/2013 6:55:47 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson