Or a wise a prudent move based on their lifesyle?
From the way I read this story the Judge may be doing the right thing.
Too many things add up against this couple.
My first thought was that the judge acted wrong, but after reading about the animals, their living in a motel, jobless,
Of course any new couple is using their child as a learning experience. no one knows what parenthood is until they do it, but if they cannot take care of animals, thta is a bad sign.
They seem to be implying that even though he was only 12, the sexual abuse he was dishing out was pretty serious. He’d also have to be one messed up puppy to be doing that kind of crap at that age.
Once you lose one child, it’s over. They will grab your kids at birth and believe me, usually rightly so. Why is this broad continuing to procreate with a fiend?
A SEX OFFENDER at the age of 12? And no repeats since then?
As poor parents as it seems they were, to take their child for THIS reason is not right.
“We had just lost our fourth baby, so she sent me to the liquor store,” the father recalled.
He came home with a bottle of London Dry Gin, and “we got to drinking.”
Then they got to fighting, and then he got arrested.
I believe that tells us much....whatever else is true this yob is in no way interested in following social convention or even just the common sense of being an adult
If they lived in this country, that couple would be Obama voters.
The part about the 17 year old sex crime is BS. That’s not why the baby got yanked.
The devil is in the details. Sad situation. : (
For pedos - it’s a sexual orientation. The desire and urge does not go away without God’s intervention and the perv’s commitment to following Him as a man reborn in Christ.
Anyway, that’s my opinion...that and fourbucks will get you a crappy cup at Starbucks. : )