Skip to comments.
The Art of Rock Balancing by Michael Grab
Twistedsifter.com ^
| January 2, 2013
| Michael Grab
Posted on 03/09/2013 7:38:04 AM PST by Twotone
Michael Grab is an artist that has been rock balancing since 2008. Much of his recent work has been done around the Boulder, Colorado area. Grab finds the process both spiritual and therapeutic. On his site gravityglue.com, Grab explains:
(Excerpt) Read more at twistedsifter.com ...
TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Hobbies; Outdoors
KEYWORDS: art; balance; rocks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
This looks too impossible to be real. But it is certainly interesting & there are other interesting links at the bottom of this page. Something a little different for a Saturday morning.
1
posted on
03/09/2013 7:38:04 AM PST
by
Twotone
To: Twotone
2
posted on
03/09/2013 7:45:23 AM PST
by
Paladin2
To: Twotone
Nothing beats God's hand.
3
posted on
03/09/2013 7:46:04 AM PST
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: Twotone
rock balancing? i don't even know what that is.
4
posted on
03/09/2013 7:47:12 AM PST
by
Drawn7979
To: Paladin2
Somebody has a lot of free time:
5
posted on
03/09/2013 7:47:19 AM PST
by
Paladin2
6
posted on
03/09/2013 7:47:57 AM PST
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
7
posted on
03/09/2013 7:49:30 AM PST
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: Paladin2
8
posted on
03/09/2013 7:51:51 AM PST
by
Twotone
(Marte Et Clypeo)
To: mylife
9
posted on
03/09/2013 7:53:42 AM PST
by
AuntB
(Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
To: Twotone; greeneyes; JRandomFreeper; Travis McGee; Kartographer; pookie18; FreedomPoster; ...
Randomly pinging some of my FRiends...this is truly awesome! (This is not a ping list!)
10
posted on
03/09/2013 8:14:22 AM PST
by
TEXOKIE
(We must surrender only to our Holy God and never to the evil that has befallen us.)
To: Twotone
The guy's got nothing on my eight year old...
11
posted on
03/09/2013 8:20:59 AM PST
by
raybbr
(People who still support Obama are either a Marxist or a moron.)
To: Twotone
Much of his recent work has been done around the Boulder, Colorado area. Sounds like the right place to be.
12
posted on
03/09/2013 9:15:22 AM PST
by
Flick Lives
(We're going to be just like the old Soviet Union, but with free cell phones!)
To: Twotone
Nice. I saw an article on him a few years ago.
Patience, concentration, a steady hand. We had games like that when I was a kid. Wooden pieces, though, not rock.
13
posted on
03/09/2013 9:41:15 AM PST
by
Moltke
("I am Dr. Sonderborg," he said, "and I don't want any nonsense.")
To: Twotone
I have seen this and it can be appealing, seeing it outdoors is better than seeing a photograph.
14
posted on
03/09/2013 9:50:37 AM PST
by
ansel12
(Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
To: Paladin2
Saw this on a California Beach. I could get two. Three...forget it. Its witchcraft.
To: Gadsden1st
I think a very fast shutter speed helps ;-)
16
posted on
03/09/2013 11:22:07 AM PST
by
Paladin2
To: Paladin2
I think a very fast shutter speed helps ;-) Not so, at least all the flowing water shots where shot w/ minimum aperture and very slow shutter speed. That's how you get that ethereal, kinda blurry, kinda foggy look over the falling water with a very deep depth of field. It's basically a time exposure letting the moving water blur. It's an old trick, I think it goes all the way back to Ansel Adams.
You have to override all the automatic settings on your fancy digital SLR to get the effect.
Regards,
GtG
17
posted on
03/09/2013 5:26:24 PM PST
by
Gandalf_The_Gray
(I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
To: Gandalf_The_Gray
My thinking was a sharp focus with a big aperture to make the background fuzzy.
18
posted on
03/09/2013 6:52:25 PM PST
by
Paladin2
To: Paladin2
My thinking was a sharp focus with a big aperture to make the background fuzzy. If you go wide open on aperture, your "shutter speed" is going to speed up to the max to prevent over exposure burning out all the detail. At fast effective shutter speeds you'll see all the little droplets of water frozen in the air which is kind of a cool effect if that's what you are looking for. But to get that lazy, dreamy, kind of fuzzy fog effect you need to slow the shutter speed down as much as you can and use a minimum aperture to get maximum depth of field in sharp focus with out over exposing the entire composition. Try it both ways and see which way you like best.
Regards,
GtG
PS I've done it a lot with film cameras but I've never tried it with a digital SLR, it should work the same way, no?
19
posted on
03/09/2013 8:27:09 PM PST
by
Gandalf_The_Gray
(I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
To: TEXOKIE
Fascinating. Thanks for the ping!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson