Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: moneyrunner

Good points, but this is wrong:

“A photo taken at this stage of the firing process would also reveal the forces of recoil upon the shooter.”

There is clear motion blur at the muzzle, upward and to the rear at a ~45 degree angle. At the rear (see trigger guard) the blur is largely rearward.

The author may not realize that some bird guns and loads are quite lightly recoiling.


27 posted on 02/03/2013 2:24:47 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Universal Background Check -> Registration -> Confiscation -> Tyranny -> Genocide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Beelzebubba

Yeah, it does show the recoil.

Which means he was shooting even lower than it appears in the photo.

Shooting rabbits or groundhog maybe. If it was skeet he must have been shooting them before they were launched... which does seem like something he’d do.


32 posted on 02/03/2013 2:35:08 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Beelzebubba

“The author may not realize that some bird guns and loads are quite lightly recoiling.”

Ah! Come on! There was probably nothing in that shell besides the primer and the wad. “ Pull!——ploot.” And mount the stock against your Clavicle,,, pain happens! Notice that they’ve changed their narrative. It’s no longer Skeet, it’s now clay targets.


51 posted on 02/03/2013 3:17:50 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson