Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CSM
I tend to agree that if we removed the government from the discussion of marriage, then we would probably see a strengthening of marriage and a weakening of the marriage attackers!


Marriage is a religous concern, for sure. But also a vital civil issue as well. And more than that - marriage is the foundation of a healthy and productive society. Has been since the ancient Greeks and Romans.

Liberals are dead set on destroying the traditional marriage. From replacing the father with a welfare check to no fault divorces to same-sex marriages and worse. And it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see the natural results of this; poverty, crime, welfare roles increasing, unemployment, mass murders at schools and on and on we go.

To say that the government should not be involved in marriage is as bad as endorsing LBJ's Great Society programs and B. Hussein's same sex  marriage executive orders which are soon to come. The government must be involved in upholding marriage between a man and a woman or face a complete colapse.

83 posted on 01/11/2013 12:36:50 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: Responsibility2nd

OK, so you are OK with the misrepresentation in the article and you have moved on. My point was most regarding the article, however I notice that I failed to make a clear distinction. They were discussing the involvement of the Federal Government in marriage. It is inappropriate and weakens our overall rights.


84 posted on 01/11/2013 12:48:37 PM PST by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson