OK, so you are OK with the misrepresentation in the article and you have moved on. My point was most regarding the article, however I notice that I failed to make a clear distinction. They were discussing the involvement of the Federal Government in marriage. It is inappropriate and weakens our overall rights.
So. Lets go back to the article. You said... This article you are referencing completely misrepresented the discussion by GB. He was actually agreeing with “Penn” (of “& tellar”) that we would be better off if the government were not involved in marriage at all.
Look. If you are correct, and I assume you are, then Beck is wrong. Completely wrong. As I said in post 83....To say that the government should not be involved in marriage is as bad as endorsing LBJ's Great Society programs and B. Hussein's same sex marriage executive orders which are soon to come.