Posted on 12/20/2012 4:12:33 PM PST by KC_Lion
Governor Palin goes On the Record with Greta Van Susteren.
Sounds to me as though we share more in common than we don’t. I had hoped she would run and, like you, was crushed when she didn’t.
However, unlike you, I just couldn’t get onboard with Romney. He was a poor choice that the RNC rammed down our throats and, at best, he was a lackluster campaigner and, not picking Palin as his VP hurt him.
IMO, if Palin thinks she will run in ‘16, she will be disappointed. The support won’t be there and, after 8 years of zero, the only thing she will be able to do is sweep up the ashes of a once geat nation and tos them in the dustbin of history.
Pity. She could have made a huge difference and chose to play it safe.
Thanks for a good, honest discussion. I enjoyed it.
You know, dude, you’re tiresome. In a previous response I gave you a test and you failed miserably. When I told you that I initially supported Dewhurst, I was testing how you would respond to an admission I didn’t have to make.
You did what a fundamentally dishonest, immature, unprincipled and unethical person would do - you used that as a weapon with which to attack me further. You failed to detect the honesty and candor with which I conveyed that information. Those are very troubling characteristics about you.
You have also demonstrated that you are a one-trick pony. You cannot comprehend that someone can criticize someone they admire without being 100% against them. That also conveys to me how much you have yet to learn about life and the world around you.
Finally, You have accused me of being vicious, vile and hateful in my posts about Sarah. But, have you read the things you wrote to me? Go back and re-read them as though they had been sent TO you, NOT written BY you.
An honest person would be a bit surprised and a little ashamed that they allowed their invective to go that far.
You won’t.
Keep working at it< Star. Eventually the shroud will be removed from your eyes and you will see reality as it really is.
Meantime, go back to reading another fairy tale about how Princess Palin slew the mighty dragon!
LOL, interesting how you work it, first troll with the nasty stuff, hard core stuff, go for Palin’s throat, and then take a high horse pose as though you never really did all that, and you are just an innocent, against such mean ol people who don’t truly understand you and your deeper feelings.
Yes you supported Dewhurst, Palin broke that up and gave us Ted Cruz, I’m glad that Cruz and Palin were successful enough to win your vote and all the other votes that it took to put him over Dewhurst.
I’m also glad that Palin did the same to Senator Bob Kerry in Nebraska.
Palin had a pretty good year, while the anti-Palin portion of the GOP was a disaster.
“For all of the invective that has been aimed at me, please tell me, quote me, or somehow indicate where I said I hated Sarah, couldn’t stand her, anything like that.” That’s what I posted to you. You then proceeded to selectively pull from some previous posts that showed NOTHING that I asked you to show me but you finished up with a flourish and a grand “Ta-Daa!”
So, since you’re lazy and disinterested in the truth, I went back and selectively pulled from some of my responses to show what I want to show.
Here ya go:
“Sarah is a very popular figure with conservatives. Her book sales (I own and have read both of them) and personal
appearances have drawn the kinds of crowds that Obama can only dream of, today. Were she to have run for elected office, her popularity would make her a shoo-in. I would have LOVED to see candidate Palin “nuking” not only the other ‘Pubbies in the field we had, but her opponent Obama during the debates. But she didn’t because she wasn’t a candidate.
She chose to say little about him during the election and, most important, she chose not to run. Then, AFTER the dust has settled, the election has been held between Obama and a lackluster candidate like Romney, she comes out and “nukes” her would-be opponent. That’s not a position statement, that’s sniping.
Some here have postulated that 2016 is HER time. I don’t think so. After 4 more years of Obama, all she will have left is to sweep up the ashes of a once great country and toss them into the dustbin of history. We needed Sarah now. America needed Sarah now. By 2016, we will be broke, militarily weak and just one more third world country thinking it has significance in the world.
In case you haven’t noticed, we have already become the America that Ayn Rand described at the end of Atlas Shrugged. Corrupt, bloated government, union thugs, anti-business environment and phony environmental concerns. Our Constitution has been fed into the shredder as has the rule of law. All that’s missing is Galt’s Gulch. After another 4 years of Obama, what will Sarah be able to do except fall short of our needs and expectations. Our money will be so valueless that bread could end up costing about $25/loaf. We already have been warned that milk may rise to $6/gal. NEXT YEAR So, what will there be for Sarah to fix? We will either be in revolt or in absolute chaos.
If she wants to position herself to run for some office in 2016, she needs to stop sniping at Obama. That’s a Democrat
tactic (campaigning against the past). She needs to start expressing her vision for America, what she would do as POTUS to restore America to that “shining city on the hill” as Reagan described it.
(snip)
But, by 2016, America will be such a third-world dirthole there will be nothing to do but help bury the ashes of what was once a great country. Her time was this year. The need was this year. 4 more years of Obama will leave us broke, militarily weak and just one more third world country thinking we still have significance in the world.
If Sarah chose to sit out this election for whatever reason, that’s her business. I have no issue with that. However, after choosing not to run, attacking the policies and style of someone who would have been her opponent in this last election is simply sniping.
A lot of posters here have attacked me for expressing my opinion of her remarks. As if we couldn’t tell, I’m not
presidential material, she is. I have never run for public office and never will. She has successfully held elected
office and may do so again. These are major distinctions between her expressing her opinions about Obama and me
expressing my opinion about her expressing her opinion.
I would LOVE to have seen candidate Palin smoking Obama and the other so-called ‘Pubbies during the debates, but we idn’t get that chance. If or when we ever do, it will not be an epic battle between her and America’s worst, most corrupt, most anti-American, non-natural born, ineligible and radical president. It will likely be against either Joe Biteme, whom a 2 year-old could smoke, or HilLIARy who has gotten where she is because of her lies and the Clinton machine.
These are major differences. And, if she wants to be a candidate in 2016, for God’s sake, she doesn’t need to run against Obama, that’s a Democrat tactic (campaigning against the past). She needs to express her own vision of America, of America’s exceptionalism and how she will work to restore America to greatness.”
I’ll continue. You are a small person who engages in outrageous, ludicrous hyperbole to get attention. You are more willing to say things online than you would in your pathetic real life in hopes of being noticed. As I said yesterday, these are all benchmarks of an extremely immature person and you fit that description to a tee.
You can keep posting idiotic comments to me if you choose, but, like any gnat, I’ve swatted you away and I’m done. Doubtless, you will take that as a victory . . . . . most people who win a pyhrric victory do!
Thanks for your response.
I still believe Palin holds a huge support base. It will however need to be tended while others throw their hats in the ring. She is more out than in now, and will need to bring herself back in deliberately this time.
I myself would not mind, a heads-up from her sometime soon that the topic is at least on her radar screen.
Best regards.
If ansel12 is ‘small’ you must be totally invisible and indiscernable from the dust.
You’re a standard PDS hate monger.
Here ya go:
Sorry, but Like I said you tipped your Hand on your first post. First reactions are always the most Honest.
I like Sarah, but shes wearing thin. ANYONE can sit on the sidelines and snipe. If this is all she is going to do, then she needs to focus more on cooking moose stew and leave the politics to those with thicker skin.
Right now, she only appears to be a tease. She wont run for any office, but shell sit on the sidelines and snipe at those actually playing the game. Whether any of us like him or not zero went out, campaigned, got his union thugs and others behind him and won.
Gov. Palin has . . . . . . . . ??
I don't know how you reconcile those feelings with supposedly Loving to watch Sarah in a debate.
You are trying to Play both sides and Failing Badly at it.
Dusty, on this thread you have joined a team, even tried to become it’s leader, although JR gives that title to EveningStar.
You succeeded in hijacking the thread with your PDS.
You have succeeded in joining the ranks of the most infamous Palin haters on freerepublic, wtc911 and EveningStar, if BobJ and pissant were around you guys could all be high fiving each other, or whatever you anti-Palin trolls do.
Way to go Dusty, but the “victory” is in the continuing effectiveness of Governor Palin, our/her historic gains in 2010, and her Senate wins out of the ashes of 2012.
We tea party conservatives continue to support her and her fight.
She DID run for office, and won, that's why we call her GOV. Palin. She also was tapped for the office of Vice-President, and ran her heart out, against the Democrats, their media lapdogs, and, unfortunately,the elitists in her own party. Her efforts, even against all that, brought John McCain darn close to the Oval Office.
I frankly think she has EARNED the right to sit on the sidelines and comment on the political scene, because she has been on the receiving end of some of the worst of it.
OMG!! Another one!??
Suze, read further through the thread and make sure that you CLEARLY comprehend the context of my posts.
When you’re done . . . . . . . . don’t get back to me.
You're a hoot!!
What you know about me, in particular, and about people, in general, would fit on the head of a pin and leave plenty of room for the Lord's Prayer and the Gettysburg Address.
It's simple; so simple that even you will be able to understand it.
Ya ever watch married people fight? Do they both detest and hate one another, or do they love each other and have occasional disagreements about a specific topic?
This is what you and the rest of the mini-minds on this thread don't seem to grasp. People (watch me carefully, here, I'm quick!) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (I love making you wait for this) . . are complex and capable of complicated, multi-layered thoughts and emotions.
Even Reagan paled in comparison with Gov Palin in upholding conservative ideals. When she takes her oath of office as POTUS on Jan 20, 2017, we’ll probably look back with amusement at all the sniping by PDS afflicted freepers on this thread...
The Only Emotion I see coming from you is a very bad case of PDS.
You say you support her and yet you are full of second guessing and sideline criticism when she is only trying to push the Conservative cause.
You want her to be more involved and yet when she is you say she isn't doing enough.
Sarah Isn't playing the tired old Rep VS Democrat here and yet some people cling on to that because that is all they know.
Yeah, I figured that you weren’t sharp enough to get it, but I tried.
Merry Christmas, anyway.
Your Faux Concern hasn't tricked me.
You've outed yourself and now are trying to cover it up.
Stay over on Democrat Underground where you belong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.