Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teacher's Reward Program Charges Second-Graders for Bathroom Breaks
nbc ^ | 12.2.2012 | By Kevin Cokely

Posted on 12/02/2012 11:53:38 AM PST by Morgana

The mother of a 7-year-old Irving elementary school student says her son wet his pants in class after his teacher refused to let him use the restroom Thursday afternoon.

"I was absolutely appalled," Sonja Cross said. "I could not believe it."

The first-year teacher at J.O. Davis Elementary awards her students with "Boyd Bucks" for good behavior. Going to the bathroom outside of the three scheduled breaks costs two Boyd Bucks per trip.

Cross' son, an honor roll student, needed to go to the bathroom, but he sat back down because he didn’t have any Boyd Bucks, his mother said.

"He tried to hold it as much as he could, but he just couldn’t," Cross said. "He came home from school, and he was crying and really upset."

"Really, that's just unhealthy," Cross said. "I think that she had no concern for the children."

Cross complained to the teacher, but didn’t like the response.

"Originally when I first spoke with the teacher, she was just going to show my son special treatment, but then I said, 'That's just not good enough. I need for you to stop this for all the children,'" she said.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcdfw.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: arth; bathroombreak; homeschool
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: HiTech RedNeck
If your only "break" was lunchtime/recess, you probably went when you had the chance.

"Price of tea in China"...gah! that's an old one... older than me!

61 posted on 12/02/2012 4:50:53 PM PST by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

A kid on the row next to me did worse than pee in his pants during our 2nd grade Christmas party. I remember that!


62 posted on 12/02/2012 4:56:11 PM PST by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Might have been one of those teachers that hired the professional license examination test taker to take her teachers license exam.


63 posted on 12/02/2012 5:19:12 PM PST by RetiredTexasVet (The law of unintended consequences is an unforgiving and vindictive b!tch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
" Homework" is merely another name for homeschooling.

I don't remember ever needing my parents help doing homework...except maybe giving me spelling words or listening recite something I had to memorize. In fact, I do remember trying to get it done in school so I didn't have homework. I hated homework.

64 posted on 12/02/2012 5:24:40 PM PST by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: RetiredTexasVet; Morgana

imagine you just spent 5 Boyd Bucks, which you earned through hard work and good behavior, on stickers and stuff.

Then the very next day you have a bathroom emergency and not allowed to go because you don’t have the 2 “bucks”.

You don’t have them, not because you were a bad kid, but because you spent them on trinkets. Now you have to be humiliated in front of the whole class who get to watch you pee your pants!

Where is the incentive to keep being a good kid??

Remember this happened to me in the late 70’s, in the SAME school dstrict!!


65 posted on 12/02/2012 5:32:55 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
It is my observation that academically successful children, whether home or institutionally schooled, are doing the **same** amount of home study. And...Their parents share the **same** value for education and have similar discipline and home habit.

BWAHAHAHA!!! It's called homework, you kill me.

66 posted on 12/02/2012 5:34:26 PM PST by verga (A nation divided by Zero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: verga

I request that you not ping for the remainder of this thread.

If you wish to comment on my posts without notifying that is fine with me. Also. please do not send private mail.

Respectfully and politely,

Wintertime


67 posted on 12/02/2012 5:43:08 PM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

That’s what homeschooling parent do.

Homeschooling parents of academically successful children that I know didn’t and aren’t helicopter parents. Academically successful children ( home or institutionally educated ) are independent learners.


68 posted on 12/02/2012 5:47:44 PM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I would not have cared for the “bucks” back then and even though the word was not yet in my vocabulary my attitude would have been f*** it.


69 posted on 12/02/2012 6:04:44 PM PST by Morgana (Time to play cowboys and muslims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I was an am a really nice and ultra decent person. IMO


70 posted on 12/02/2012 6:08:01 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

“I was an am a really nice and ultra decent person. IMO”

—who was not paddled often in school.


71 posted on 12/02/2012 6:52:32 PM PST by Morgana (Time to play cowboys and muslims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

lolz


72 posted on 12/02/2012 7:01:48 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Quite frankly, parents who send their children to government-run schools deserve just about whatever they get.

The system is designed to produce compliant, non-independent thinking little secular humanists.


73 posted on 12/03/2012 12:31:04 AM PST by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt
The system is designed to produce compliant, non-independent thinking little secular humanists.

Because good people refuse to get involved. 40 years ago the elementary school I went to was going to stop bus transportation if you lived within a certain distance. My father drove the routes and figured that we were outside of that radius. The superintendent told him that the distance was "As the crow flies." My father explained that children don't cut through yards etc...,and asked how to get it changed. The superintendent told him he had to be on the board. My father got on the board and got the policy changed. As Gandhi said "Be the change you want in the world."

74 posted on 12/03/2012 3:05:30 AM PST by verga (A nation divided by Zero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: verga

“Because good people refuse to get involved.”

No the problem is government schooling itself. It was always intended to produce compliant, non-independent thinking little secular humanists. Adjusting bus routes won’t solve that problem.


75 posted on 12/03/2012 9:06:12 AM PST by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt
No the problem is government schooling itself. It was always intended to produce compliant, non-independent thinking little secular humanists. Adjusting bus routes won’t solve that problem.

Way to miss the point! the point was my father wanted to make a change in something that he had an interest in so he got involved.

BTW the founding fathers did support public education, so your "universal positive" statement was in error.

76 posted on 12/03/2012 11:35:52 AM PST by verga (A nation divided by Zero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
"what do you bet she is a lesbian too?"

More likely a Liberal (and a lesbo too?).

77 posted on 12/03/2012 3:07:37 PM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I sent this to the whole school board

.........
After reading a news report about a recent incident at Davis Elementary I was flabberghasted that this whole program was still happening. You probably know the incident I am referring to, a child was denied a trip to the bathroom because he didn’t have enough “Boyd bucks”. Maybe he had just spent them on stickers or something.

Children cannot control WHEN they have to go to the bathroom. I think teachers who know the kids in their classroom would be able to tell the good kids and bad kids apart and know if the kid was telling the truth. Like I said, you cannot put their bladders on a schedule.

They aren’t learning discipline when they are forced to dig through their desks desperate to find these “bucks” as the whole class watches and then traumatized and humiliated as the whole class watches him pee his pants. The only thing that kid learns is not to trust teachers and will probably start hating school. Letting a kid go to the bathroom is a lot less disruptive than having all of that happen. Especially if they empty the class and have it cleaned.

Why was I shocked to see this was going on?

Because the same thing happened to me in the late 70’s. I attended Schulze Elementary (okay probably others too since we moved a lot). It was the exact same kind of thing. It is a stupid idea to give kids “bucks” and let them spend it on goodies and trinkets if you then make them pee their pants because they no longer can buy an emergency bathroom break.

Bathroom breaks should be teachers discretion with the knowledge that kids can’t always hold it, especially since doing this a lot can bring on Urinary Tract problems. The emergency bathroom break should not be dependent on something as -yes- STUPID as “Boyd bucks”. I would rather expect the teachers to be adults and be able to make this decision by their own discretion.

Sincerely,

xxxxxxxx
xxxxx


78 posted on 12/03/2012 5:09:06 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: verga

I didn’t miss the point, but I think you did. Nothing I do can change government schools into institutions which provide a Christian education.

Regardless of what the Founders believed about public schooling, they clearly didn’t envision the federal government being involved.

My understanding is that the early promoters of publicly funded and controlled education wanted to re-engineer society away from Christianity and family, to a society in which citizens gave their allegiance to the State. That has been going on for close to 200 years and it has been very successful.


79 posted on 12/03/2012 6:01:30 PM PST by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt

Well, they had public funds (such as it was) spent on schools way back in the 1660’s colonies, albeit irregularly (here and there, for a year here and sometimes not after) and not in any coordinated manner. No, they weren’t anything like they are now and the government did not try to dictate all kinds of insane schemes.


80 posted on 12/03/2012 6:22:18 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson